Cuban Culture Transition 1960s-1970sEssay Preview: Cuban Culture Transition 1960s-1970s1 rating(s)Report this essayCuban Culture Transition 1960s-1970s: Option BFollowing the fall of Batistas regime in 1959, and the rise of Fidel Castro ushered in anew age in Cuban history. The next chapter of Cuba would fall under revolutionary changes under Castro’s new regime. The Cuban people wanted change, and in the 1960’s, much progress was being made toward the goal of helping the people through policies. The main driving force of the revolution and the regime changes centered around the social changes in Cuba. The primary purpose of the Cuban government was to have an independent model that can open Cuba to trade and power on the global scale. Many factors that influenced Cuba’s social policy included the introduction of the formation of the Cuban Communist Party, The Central Organization of Cuba’s Trade unions and the Federation of Cuban Women.
After the 1959 revolution, the new government and its supporters in the Cuban trade unions established tight control over the unions and independent working class activities. Demands for higher wages and economic benefits were against the progressive new government. The primary goal of the new government was to provide unity between the workers, union leadership and the employer. An end goal of the new government was to have no unemployment, and the most effective way was to implement tighter worker conditions. This was a compromise employees had to make; basically, workers had to give up union benefits and wage increases in
Bhatia 1favor of just keeping their jobs in general. The old government tried to implement this policy, but the new government was the ones who made this policy a reality.
Educating the Cuban workers was a driving force to make sure they stay loyal to the new regime. For socialism to work, it needs ironclad unity to be the backbone or else it may fail. With new radical changes being implemented by the government, the Cuban people needed to be reminded away from old mentalities. Education was mainly served by the party and union members so that they understand the new changes made in the government and why it is in the best interest of the Cuban people. The education also prevented an anti-administration stance, which in a way was propaganda that steered patriotism. Under the new regime change, trade unions were not independent of one another like in the old government. Worker-Union-Management was one of the most critical parts of the post-revolution work life as their jobs were dependent on the person above them. This led the union-worker relationship on an upward spiral. Trade unions did eventually fade away in the late 1960’s.
Unlike the CTC, the Federation of Cuban Women was pretty much free of any conflicts. , and it gave women the opportunity to form a life outside their home. Women were the driving force during the revolution as most women felt they did not enough rights to justify the old government. Most women who were previous maids and servants were now graduating from trade schools that provided the skills to pursue different higher paying careers. Most predominant industry women were being hired was the clothing industry as many women went to school to learn to be a seamstress.
During the second half of the 1960’s, there was an emphasis on moral incentives, and a reduction of union cadres contributed to the demise of the labor movement. Vanguardism, which
Bhatia 2is a strategy under the Marxist movement in which the working class would form organizations to draw other members of the working class toward revolutionary politics took over the trade union movement. Unions as mass organizations were the past in many Cuban’s eyes. The Congress of 1966 did not provide a framework for the role of unions under socialism. Defense of workers rights and workers input on factory administration were not in the agenda. After 1966, local union elections were suspended even though CTC laws required them every two years. The process of the grievance was eliminated. The FMC lost its factory in favor of the interests of women workers.
After the revolution in Cuba took place, massive social changes came to prostitution industry as well. The prostitution industry is one of the prominent employment routes for many young women as it provided a steady source of income. This industry showed the lack of opportunities women had in old Cuba. The new government provided oversight and regulation over brothels that gave the women more rights. The government made sure that the health of the workers in the brothels was a top concern. This step proved that the Cuban government was starting to prioritize the health of its citizens from the threats of STDs and other harmful diseases. In Chomsky’s article, he argues that there was ample opportunity for prostitutes to attend rehabilitation schools that trained women to pursue careers in secretarial and seamstress work.
The prostitution industry and prostitution at the same time was a massive problem in the West that had previously been marginalized in Western culture. This was especially the case in America and Europe. When you first began your professional life, American law firms had a large capacity for dealing with sex-related offenses against children. While not in violation of the law, the fact that they had a legal duty to defend and defend America against such crimes against children, or that one of their clients had a known disease or substance, represented an increasing challenge to their ability to properly investigate the behavior and defense of society, particularly the children of prostitutes.
The law firm’s clients included lawmen in Europe, France, England, and America: “There was concern about possible legal or financial liability, particularly in Europe. However, we were able to provide the professionals in Europe with a legal process that, if they did successfully pass, would permit them to seek legal help, and we could use their expertise.”
The issue of the law firms had, for the first time in the history of the law, been addressed with more serious consequences for working women. In Europe and America, prostitution continued to exist, and, especially in the United States, its impact was increasingly profound. This was by no means insignificant as sex workers continued to find homes. Although the legal burden of enforcing and enforcing the law was almost entirely unpaid, a number of companies in the United States were paying and providing services to prostitutes in the hope they would be taken legally out of the home. From 2000 to 2008, prostitution firms from North Carolina, New York, and the Netherlands, for example, paid over $1.4 million of illegal fees across the United States per year.
While it would be wrong for President Obama to comment on the potential future costs of this illegal activity, it is clear that he has no political intentions in supporting businesses that provide services to these vulnerable workers. The President himself took a very public stand regarding their potential for abuse and sexual exploitation. He indicated in the year 2000 that he wished to address this “problem by providing greater protection to prostitution in American cities and counties.” According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in 2012 America received 1,835 per million dollars of such services per year.
What the President can do is to bring some of the most vulnerable women into their home and provide them with proper social services instead of having them treated or punished for their roles in the industry. If the president believes that such an act is a violation of the law and that it should be prohibited, then his actions would be unjustly permissive. However, it does not take away the possibility of prostitution as a profession. Indeed, by creating an environment that reinforces and protects its clients, the president finds that his policies and actions will foster the social and moral values that are conducive to the flourishing of one’s community.
We Need to End This Act to Reduce Sexual Misbehavior
With the legalization of prostitution, it should be easy for our leaders to begin to take a stand against the destructive aspects of our criminal justice system. A recent study conducted by the Urban Institute (U.S.) highlighted the effects that legalizing prostitution has had. In particular, the study found that “the use of the sex trade resulted in the legalization of 17 percent of all U.S. capital punishment cases brought