Poverty: Bottoms UpEssay title: Poverty: Bottoms UpPoverty: Bottoms UpPoverty is an issue that surrounds us whether we want to admit it or not. There are many reasons that poverty plays an active roll in today=s society. It is part of everyday life and affects everyone. Social workers have been trying to help these people for many years now, but only with limited success because the poverty rate keeps climbing and there is not enough help available to give everyone personal treatment. There are many efforts that are being made in order to help this struggle. There are food stamps, welfare, WICS (Women Infants and Children Support), etc. The arguments with these programs are that are we making it easier for the poor to remain poor. AIt=s important to recognize that these figures [that I use] are a year old. They cover 2003, not the current year. Given current economic conditions, it is extremely likely that poverty fell during 2004, although the official figures won=t be available until the fall of next year@ (Fox News, par 1).
In order to interpret the causes of poverty in America, we must first understand how poverty is defined. AFor most Americans, the word >poverty= suggests destitution: an inability to provide a family with nutritious food, clothing, and reasonable shelter@ (Rector, par 2). The issue is not that poverty is defined too broadly, it is that many people do not understand that our socioeconomic structure means you must make much more money just to survive. Poverty use to be Aconsidered a responsibility of society as a whole . . . Now poverty is often blamed on the poor and on the system of government support created to help them@ (Stengel, par 5). Is our over materialistic society to blame? Society seems to Ahave sought to convince us that in addition to the basic human needs of air, water, food and shelter, we all have a fifth human need for novelty@ (Sine 89).
If you make even a dollar or two an hour above the minimum wage, you still suffer. Okay, suppose you make seven dollars an hour at forty hours a week (full-time). This equals about $14,500 a year before taxes. The poverty threshold for 2003 for a family of four was 18,660 (Census Bureau). So, the issue is not that the Apoor@ people are not really poor, it is that even when you Amake-it@ you can still be poor. The issue of whom we need to help is far more than just the homeless, though they still need our help. Our system is flawed, there seems to be far more losers than winners at the AAmerican Dream.@ Our government needs to choose between continuing efficiency and favoritism to the upper class or choosing economic sufficiency for all people.
There is something definitely wrong when more than thirty-five million people are poor in such a country as America. At the same time, we need to take a look as the actual living conditions of those that the government deems poor (Rector, par 1). As stated by the Fox News Channel,
AOverall typical American defined as poor by the government has a car, air conditioning, a refrigerator, a stove, a clothes washer and dryer, and a microwave. He has two color televisions, cable or satellite TV reception, a VCR or DVD player, and a stereo. He is able to obtain medical care. His home is in good repair and is not overcrowded. By his own report, his family isn=t hungry, and he had sufficient funds in the past year to meet his family=s essential needs. While this individual=s life is not opulent, it is equally far from the popular images of dire poverty conveyed by the press, activist and politicians.@ (par 7).
If this is true, the poor are still able to live a fairly comfortable life. They are rich compared to the rest of the world. Are the poor feeling poor because they do not have enough money to buy into the Acomforts@ of our society?
This of course should not be taken for all those who are considered poor. There is a wide range of living conditions, and there are those folks who are at the other end of the spectrum. A ARoughly a third do experience at least one problem, such as overcrowding, temporary hunger, or difficulty getting medical care@ (Rector, par 7).
AThe main causes of child poverty in the United States are low levels of parental work and high numbers of single-parent families@ (Rector, par 66). In order to reduce this, parents need to work more hours. According to the Heritage Foundation, Athe typical poor family with children is supported by only 800 hours of work during the year: That amounts to 16 hours of work per week. If work in each family were raised to 2,000 hours per year – the equivalent of one adult working 40 hours per week through the year – nearly 75 percent of poor children would be lifted out of official poverty@ (Rector, par 57). But, in today=s economic status it is hard to find a full time job with benefits. The jobs
of the middle classes and for working families have been declining for a long time, and so, with the economic downturn, there is no shortage of work for family members who are unemployed, the majority of whom are elderly and the younger children. There may be some cases in which the work itself is much more necessary than would in today’s economy to support work-family families. For example, under the ACA, children enrolled in preschool under the same age as their parents in the government program for pre-K is entitled to all, not only basic public assistance, but an education that includes both traditional health care and pre-care support, as well as health costs, school costs, and more. Many of these children are in such jobs as a mechanic, or as home foreman that they cannot actually pay for or benefit from the private health care system; they are paid less. These children also need to work full-time to cover the costs of attending the local school and the day care services; they also are not enrolled in any public or private program that provides a basic family. At the same time, parents often are required to spend money on social services or education that are not provided in the primary or secondary education system, and even are still paying more. So, there are instances, in the past 30 years or so, where children have been forced to work under the supervision of adults and to stay in poverty. Thus, there are families in and around poverty, but little change has occurred in their lives, especially in the education, health care, and housing sectors. Some of these families have simply stopped paying full salaries and are taking steps to ensure that that income can be maintained even when the money is used to pay for public services. The result is that many families are forced to remain in poverty, even as they have no means or means of living. This cannot happen in the U.S. without reducing the costs to the system of caring for families, which is a major issue in all of our societies, especially as the federal government works as a government of the poor. Because family members that can’t afford to pay public benefits are required to find work to support themselves, they are now forced to do so and face higher working conditions, with the increased burdens on the family member. The U.S. government should end its subsidy of family members that refuse to pay for public services. This would greatly reduce the number of children without basic education and child care under the current system and make it more difficult for families with children to survive and work in the U.S. However, even by decreasing the number of children in the very poor children of the current system, government action is needed. The number of disabled children could be reduced, and children