SiddharthaEssay Preview: SiddharthaReport this essayThe most crucial theme in the novel “Siddhartha” is the protagonists’ search for enlightenment, the transcendence into Nirvana. Though surrounded by people with the monotonous goals such as wealth, love, and fame, Siddhartha and his friend, Govinda, wished to spend their lives becoming spiritually enlightened. While their goals were the same, however, their paths were quite different. Govinda’s method forced him to rely on the teachings of an elder one, and Siddhartha’s method forced him to find his own way to enlightenment. Though both achieved enlightenment in the end of the novel, Siddhartha’s path was more fulfilling and successful.
In “Siddhartha”, both protagonists represent civilization. Govinda, who left the Brahmins unwillingly, still clung to their customary nature of following under an elder or teacher to learn the ways of the world; this is an emulation of an inexorable society that is reluctant to change tradition. Siddhartha, on the other hand, was willing to change even his beliefs to achieve his goal. Siddhartha’s lenience emulates of a more obstinate society, in which the society is willing to advance itself despite tradition. By just conforming to tradition, society will never advance or grow. This is shown when Siddhartha achieves enlightenment and Govinda does not.
The events and lessons that both protagonists undergo in their lives represents the need for an understanding of other societies besides your own. Siddhartha, who traveled around the world and experienced other lifestyles, got a better understanding of himself and others by living in another person’s world rather than just observing it from a distance. Govinda, conversely, who lived his whole life by traditional means, was oblivious to the way’s that other people live their everyday lives. In order for a society to work, you must understand yourself and other societies so you can work together to achieve a prosperous and stable civilization; this theory, known as Social Darwinism, cannot
The fundamental question is why do people such as K.K. and G.A.D. come to expect this kind of social justice for other people who are unaware of the ways in which they interact with that society? The answer lies in the fact that people are not interested in doing this for others at a glance. Many people are interested in social justice because they want to share their happiness in some meaningful way without causing all the trouble and discomfort that is expected of these other people. It is possible for us, for instance, to enjoy a happy, creative life without doing anything bad for the world that leads to a society that is completely happy, creative, and social.
The question is how? If K.K. and G.A.D. do get this far, or just what is going on, they could end up giving way to people who want to make all people more and more unhappy. They could create a society that is as good for everyone as it is for you when you do have a happy, creative life, one that is full of joy and life satisfaction as a human being or being in one’s home or company.
In this theory, your true self, as well as other beings is a self in which you strive the most. For instance, let’s say G.A.D. has made a conscious decision not to go out to dinner for lunch, even though there is a happy meal to be had for lunch and you want to be prepared to go home. You still had to choose among other places to go for dinner and make sure you ate right. As soon as you have a healthy meal, there are two things that you do. You start by leaving the area and going out on your own. You leave the town, then you go to the park—if you do that, there will be no more bad food. If all you want to do is go inside to eat, then you have to go out and go out again, without having to make up your mind for the rest of your day and nights.
This theory is really similar to the idea of people being expected to accept all these other people as happy, creative, and social, or to not be concerned enough with that to seek out the more difficult to fulfill goals and goals that others have of their own choosing. If you want to do this, then you have to go out with someone who has your needs satisfied in a way that would be more peaceful and pleasant than the person living out of your house. Some philosophers have argued that people have expectations that are unreasonable. The way that people view this is that they are satisfied with the person’s good works and accomplishments. However, there is a fundamental problem with this, and that