Forced HeroesForced HeroesForced Heroes?There is a controversy that is causing quite an uproar. People are saying that since other countries require young people to serve in the military, for at least two years, that The United States should too. The United States is one of few countries that don’t require this. But, this is a good thing.Nobody should be forced into serving in the military. Going into the military should be a person’s choice. No country, including the United States, should be able to force a person into military service. This is especially true for the United States. After all, we do stand on the principal that, “all men are created free and equal”, right?
According to our constitution, it would be “unconstitutional” for any American citizen, to be forced into military service. Only those who want to go to a military branch, such as, army, marines, air force, should have to go. If you feel like you want to enlist that is your choice, and the constitution says you have the right to make that choice. But as stated, it should be a choice.There are logical reasons behind the idea of forcing people into the military. If a country did not have enough volunteers, then forcing people into military service would seem more morally correct. Another reason would be that some countries leaders just want a big and strong military. But, if the people serving do not want to serve, then they will not be disciplined enough to have a strong military force like the leaders would like to have.
“The United States military has to do what is needed to maintain the good standing of American citizens, and so we need to make the United States army so that when it can fight on the ground it can lead the world in the fight against terrorism and other forms of tyranny. If we were to take all those people who want to be our soldiers and train and equip them to fight the enemy, we’d still be fighting terrorists as well.”> —Dennis KwanDennis Kwan
The “Free State of Palestine” in America.
“The United States is in danger because the governments of Europe and the United Nations allow, with one hand, international terror groups like al-Qa’ida and ISIS to operate freely under the guise of peaceful protest, using terrorist funding for their own ‘freedom and security.’ The U.S. military cannot do this. In fact, NATO provides weapons to terrorists and so does the terrorist group ISIS,” the Constitution states.
Although the “Free State of Palestine” is often misstated, the fact is that it is only referred to in “international law”:
“Article 14, section 1… declares that ‘the right to live is the only legitimate and proper basis for national self-government, and that all foreign forces acting on behalf of another country are to be neutral and armed. As stated by the United Nations Security Council, the principle of state sovereignty must be respected, and the State by its very existence must not serve any personal interest or use military force or ‘terrorism,’ even for the self-protection of its own citizens.”
On 1 November 2016, President Obama signed the “Free State of Palestine” into law.
President Obama has expressed similar sentiments about the U.S. military. He has said that there will be a “crisis for the US military in the Middle East at a period when these forces are deployed in the Middle East as they have done to support terrorism in Africa, Yemen, and elsewhere. While there has been no military operation undertaken at that time for the United States military, there may be a situation wherein the US military bases and exercises in Libya are used by ISIS and other armed groups to support their recruitment and use of these forces.”[br]
In 2015, when President Obama said the US should “stay quiet,” he meant just that.