PanethncityEssay Preview: PanethncityReport this essayAsian American Studies 60b Midterm EssayPanethnicity and heterogeneity are related in the ways that they both are describing how the larger society views ethnic groups. Panethnicity is a term that describes how various ethnic groups are placed under one category, as if all the cultures were viewed as just one large culture. The term arose because of the democratic, linguistic, political, and cultural structural causes. Heterogeneity is a term that refers to the process in which identities are masked by a larger panethnic allegiance. It focuses more on the differences between each culture. Both terms can help one understand to some extent of how others view the Asian community, but it is apparent to me that heterogeneity can better describe the “Asian American”.
Loren R. Williams of Texas A&M is a non-resident scholar, including a recent PhD. He was previously dean of the College of Education at the Texas A&M University; an adjunct professor of ethnic studies and English literature at the University of Michigan; a graduate of the University of Iowa and a PhD candidate at Ohio State University. He has spent time with Asian Americans in diverse cities such as Washington DC and New York City. Read more: http://www.lorenr.winston.utm.edu/publications/LorenR_Williams_AsianAmerican.html
PanethncityEssay Preview: PanethncityReport this essayAsian American Studies 60b midterm essayPanethnicity and heterogeneity are related in the ways that they both are describing how the larger society views ethnic groups. Panethnicity is a term that describes how various ethnic groups are placed under one category, as if all the cultures were viewed as just one large cultures. The term arose because of the democratic, linguistic, political, and cultural structural causes. Heterogeneity is a term that refers to the process in which identities are masked by a larger panethnic allegiance. It focuses more on the differences between each culture. Both terms can help one understanding to some extent of how others view the Asian community, but it is evident to me that heterogeneity can better describe the “Asian American”.
Loren R. Williams of Texas A&M is a non-resident scholar, including a recent PhD. He was previously dean of the College of Education at the Texas A&M University; an adjunct professor of ethnic studies and English literature at the University of Michigan; a graduate of the University of Iowa and a PhD candidate at Ohio State University. He has spent time with Asian Americans in diverse cities such as Washington DC and New York City. Find out more: https://t.co/wQiIjxEQ9a
PanethncityEssay Preview: PanethncityReport this essayAsian American Studies 60b midterm essayPanethnicity and heterogeneity are related in the ways that they both should be describing how the larger society views ethnic groups. Panethnicity is a term that describes how various ethnic groups are placed under one category, as if all the cultures were viewed as just one large culture. The term arose because of the democratic, linguistic, political, and cultural structural causes. Heterogeneity is a term that refers to the process in which identities are masked by a larger panethnic allegiance. It focuses more on the differences between each culture. Both terms can help one understanding to some extent of how others view the Asian community, but it is evident to me that heterogeneity can better describe the “Asian Americanв�
Asian American
Answered
I think the above is a fair point. It would imply that in order to understand Asian American identities, a social study should be undertaken that can explain them to some extent. If we only study the “ethnic” issues, we don’t have much of an understanding of how to respond to these issues. On the other hand, if identity is represented more in a society that sees identity in an equal sense, we can use the identity studies to be more inclusive and to reduce the burden of cultural issues that may stem from having a different cultural heritage.
This is my question, but I will come back to it in the future.
What are a key issues that need to be addressed in the upcoming paper?
My view in my previous post is that they are four key social issues that need to be addressed in the next paper:
1. A history of Chinese-American community (i.e. the ethnic communities of the two ethnic groups of the “Asian American” community) of American-origin origin, which is generally represented in this paper in terms of the “Asian American” characteristics. I am not a white woman, so what is a white woman’s cultural upbringing, and is this represented through ethnicity? (My response to this question is that they are usually very diverse. I’ve been studying and researching the Chinese and Latino American population as Chinese-American adults for almost 30 years now and the census has made clear to me that it is highly segregated and subject to extreme discrimination as well.) 2. Ethnic groups of white immigrants and refugees, and various forms of racism (though I am not an American-American (or so I see it). There are two ways to identify the ethnic group that is most likely to be discriminated against in the state of Florida or the country. The first is that Asian American groups of people of Chinese ancestry are predominantly of Chinese origin, with the majority of their identity expressed in Japanese and American/Japanese/Asian American. This is consistent with many ethnic groups of Americans in Florida, which would support the definition of one cultural group. There are two other ways to identify a group of groups that is most likely to be discriminated against in the state of Florida, the first of which is that Chinese have historically been used for political affiliation and government. It is my hope that such data can be used to identify cultural groups that are much more closely related to white Americans.
What about immigrants?
One of the key issues here relates to identity. From the viewpoint of the ethnic group, the question is what is the political influence of immigrants on the community. I don’t necessarily mean how the immigrants are used or who they use, I am just stating the political influences on Asian Americans. I am going to consider the following categories of the immigrant population and the political influence of the immigrant on the community:
1. Immigrant with “European roots.” 1. Immigrant with “Native American roots.” 2. Mexican immigrant with “Hispanic roots.” 3. Latino immigrant with “Asian roots.” – 1 and 2 are the primary immigrants that have a large “Asian American” heritage, while 1 is the immigrant who has been a part of an immigrant background that is representative of
Heterogeneity better describes the “Asian American” because there are so many ways that Asians can be described, instead of just one common word. Take for example, in Lisa Lowe’s article, “Heterogeniety, Hybridity, and Multiplicity: Marking Asian American Differences”, she states that “But from the perspectives from Asian Americans, we are perhaps even more different [than Europeans], more diverse, among ourselves” (680). There are many different types of groups that Asians are a part of, and each culture has at least one aspect that is unique compared to the others in that same format of culture. Lowe also offers many different types of cultural examples as to why heterogeneity overpowers panethnicity when one is describing the “Asian American”. Yen Le Espiritu describes panethnicity in his essay, “Asian American Panethnicity”, and in his essay he discusses the politics surrounding Asian American panethnicity. He discusses the ideas about discrimination and histories of violence toward the Asian Americans so that they must pull together in a panethnic alliance to prevent more instances of violence and discrimination. To better clarify an understanding and the significance of both terms, a look at the Hmong, Filipino, and the Vietnamese cultures and their assimilations into the United States are good examples.
The Hmong first came into the United States because they were forced to flee their villages in Laos because the Secret War that was occurring between the United States CIA and the Northern Vietnamese people. The Hmong was recruited by the United States to block off the Vietnamese because the United States was afraid that Laos was going to fall under the communist state. The Hmong were forced to flee Laos to Thailand, and then eventually, to the United States. When they resided in clumps of areas around the United States, some of them including Merced, California; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Fresno, California; they failed to assimilate into the modern United States culture. They decided to separate themselves against all other Asian-American groups in the United States because they wanted to keep to their own culture and maintain their daily rituals and lifestyle as much as they could. In Anne Fadiman’s The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down, the Hmong family tried the western medicine style and then eventually went back to their own natural medicine, which actually worked better. Although they lived in another culture, they still fought to do keep and practice their Hmong traditions. They remained to be heterogeneous as opposed to the other cultures present in the country at that time. Over time, some Hmong did branch off and assimilate into modern US culture, which is inevitable as they began to raise their children among the modern day culture. In the documentary, “The Split Horn”, it documents a Hmong family who moves to the United States and shows how some of the children drift away from their original culture and become assimilated into modern United States culture; some of them turned away from original Hmong religion and converted into Christianity, and one married an American girl instead of a Hmong girl. I think that many of the Hmong people who immigrate into the United States prefer to be identified in a more heterogeneous light because they are very different from the other cultures and would like to keep it that way. Other cultures also have that same mindset as the Hmong, like the Filipinos.
The Filipinos, primarily the women, first migrated into the United States because of job opportunities that were given to them. The United States was in a large shortage of nurses during this time and they offered the Filipino women who were nurses to come to work in the country. The women came to the United States because a nursing job there represented upward mobility and more opportunities