Separation Of Church And State
Essay Preview: Separation Of Church And State
Report this essay
The Necessary Separation of Church and State in America
On January 1, 1802, Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to the Committee of the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut in which he stated:
“Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should `make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”
(Jefferson,1802, Letter to Danbury Baptist Association)
The strongest phrase in Thomas Jefferson’s 1802 letter, “…or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,вЂ¦Ð²Ð‚Ñœ goes to the heart of American strength. It provides the foundation upon which this nation’s strength and resolve is built. It is the groundwork laid to allow American citizens to be who they are without government interference and that freedom allows the citizens to learn and grow from each other, building the foundation with the strength of cultural and religious diversity. America was built on this foundation and it is instilled in the heart of every proud American citizen. The content of this single letter and the resultant mirrored text within the United States Constitution has not only defined the way American society functions, but has lead to the growth of the country’s diversity and power in the world as a whole. The effect of separation of church and state in the United States evolved through hard won struggles and battles, resulting in great diversity among the varying religions, backgrounds, and heritages of the citizens that make up this great country. As a result, the United States of America is willing to pay the high price of international disdain to preserve the freedoms conveyed by the concept of separation of church and state that has resulted in the strength and values inherited by its citizens.
When the original 13 colonies were established in what came to be the United States of America, the goal of the British government was to expand on its resources for trade materials and manufactured goods. Because the colonies were young and not established firmly, there were labor shortages and many of the first colonists died of starvation. In an effort to remedy the shortage, the British government sent indentured servants to work in the colonies until their debts had been repaid. Among the indentured servants and military members sent to the colonies by the government, were a large number of citizens who were seeking freedom from persecution due to differing religious and political beliefs. By the time Thomas Jefferson wrote the Danbury Letter, the country had begun growing in a direction that differed from their British history.
Thomas Jefferson’s intent in establishing the wall of separation between church and state was not to eliminate religion from the new society, but to protect the integrity and purity of religion as practiced by its citizens. This protection offered by the separation of church and state has provided a foundation of strength and opportunity gained through understanding and learning from the differences of the many diverse cultures and religions that are the building blocks of American society. The separation of church from the political government has also provided for a more accurate political representation of the many diverse citizens of which the country is made. This is different from many other countries who do not practice tolerance of such diversity, especially diversity in the areas of politics and religion. These basic premises have grown the United States of America to become one of the most culturally diverse countries in the world. This diversity is the groundwork for Americas growth and prosperity.
America’s practice of separation of church and state differs from the social and political structures of many other countries. While resulting anti-American sentiments are reflected by many countries in varying degrees, a very dangerous form of anti-Americanism is spreading across many Middle Eastern countries founded in the Muslim religion who view America as being “…so depraved that it must be destroyed.” (Katzenstein and Keohane, 2006). This is due to the radical Islamic belief that social values and political practices are only properly governed within God’s law and that a separation of God’s law and social law is innately Evil. America’s practice of separation of church and state is viewed as a rejection of God’s laws and America is considered an enemy of God. (Lewis, 1990) The greatness of America and the freedoms bestowed on American citizens that are not regulated through religious interference and direction by the American government, as a direct result of the separation of church and state, has had an unintended impact on how other nations view American citizens. To many, America is seen as lacking virtue and morals. However, these same nations don’t acknowledge the greatness that comes from accepting and understanding the melting pot of diverse cultures and religions that has created this nation’s strength.
Examples of the “prices” the United States of America has had to pay for its promotion of religious freedom, tolerance, and diversity are evident in several instances: The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers, Pentagon, and United Flight 93 on September 11, 2001 were carried out by radical Islamists as acts of Jihad, or holy war, waged against America and western society as enemies of God; the perception of arrogant American leadership in the United Nations has resulted in the loss of support from many countries that were once allies of the United States; and other terrorist attacks carried out against the United States in the name of Jihad on American soil and against American Embassies abroad have exploited weaknesses in national security, resulting in a feeling of insecurity among the citizens.
The world wide