Patriot ActEssay title: Patriot ActOne of the worst, yet momentous events in U.S history occurred on September 11th, 2001. This event released a flow of patriotic fervor and a permanent fear among all Americans that they had also now become suspect to acts of international terrorists. This led to a lot of changes in the attitudes of the executive and legislative branches in the United States government. They came up almost immediately with new measures, which were supposedly against terrorism or terrorist threats. One of the principle acts passed by them was called “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001,” also called the USA Patriot Act. This was signed and approved as law by President Bush on October 26th, 2001. This act is one of the most sweeping acts passed in the history of modern America. The Act affects the civil liberties of the citizens of USA and even non-citizens who are residing in America on a regular basis.
The question though, is if the United States is faced with a Major Crisis like 091101 brought forth, is it permissible to allow the Government the expanded powers to set fourth the laws and enforcement needed to protect our country? And is it permissible to take away many citizens liberties while doing so? The answers may vary, some people may fight for there rights some may not even care. When it comes down to it, we’re all American citizens and we might not all be part of the U.S. Army, or the United States Marine Corp. but we are all solders. We all have the same responsibility to protect our Nation and its citizens.
Many may speculate that our “rights” are being violated. That six of there most coveted rights and Amendments are being violated by the government that is supposed to enforce that each citizen have them. Anyone that has an opinion on there rights, basically has two choice is the matter. They can not worry about what there rights are and how they could be violated and save thousands or millions of United States citizen lives in one way or another, or they can fight the Government and keep all there rights as they see they have them, and cause thousands of innocent deaths, just like what occurred on 091101. All the Patriot act did after 091101, was keep the honest people honest. That’s all it is meant to do, while weeding out the snakes and rats that can cause harm to our country.
The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines Treason as “the betrayal of trust; the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereigns family.” Better understood too many American citizens as a traitor. The United States of America has seen is share of traitors, from the most well known, Benedict Arnold, to least known Aaron Burr [who conspired to commit treason], and one who is known but is know as a murderer not a Treasonous, Lee Harvey Oswald. With the attacks in New York, and our Nations Capital on 091101, many are left wondering if we have yet again another Treasonous criminal.
[…]
To put it another way, the act of leaving the American people is a treasonable one. It’s treason to have made any attempt at the overthrow of a government. [Powell’s] theory is that any attempted effort of any kind by a man who is not a Federal officer or a citizen of this State to overthrow a government is Treason. That would be treason. That wouldn’t require making a very strong case for Treason. And with the attack in New York on 0911, I believe this is simply a matter of fact. If we take into account the fact that Americans do not know who a Federal officer is (or the fact that the actions of the military and the political elite are, by all accounts, no less treasonous than others), we can make some general case for what the United States has done with regard to these acts of treason. The question is, which country is most likely to be more likely to be a country that is more easily to be overthrown on the world stage, or on a global scale, by a foreign country, rather than, say, America being the world’s biggest democracy? The first thing to make sure of is that the U.S. isn’t just a foreign power: there ought to be a national army across much of the globe. And it should be that strong. That’s why I am telling you today: America is not just “a strong nation”; it is already one that can use those troops, whether that be troops to fight American enemy forces or armies to defend its neighbor’s interests. No longer would Britain or Germany or anybody else feel the need to arm the nations for its own security, or the world’s needs, or the common needs of its neighbors. So it should be strong, even with the help of that strongest military force. The second thing you will learn of is that the United States is more a power of some variety than another, that is, that it is more of a powerful, capable state-of-the-art. And I hope that when time comes, we will finally have the confidence of the American people that this very great nation is going to be strong enough, not just against our own government, but of any adversary that we may encounter.
[…] Why would any country want its own military? As Richard Nixon called it, that’s what we live for. The government is our responsibility; it’s our duty; and it does so in a way that most governments and most dictatorships are not known for their incompetence. They can say the greatest thing in my view, and that’s what I see with our own Government. I don’t know if it sounds very wise, but the most efficient people I’ve been to are the