Death PenaltyEssay Preview: Death PenaltyReport this essayThe right to life and the right not to be subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment is recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Many people consider that the death penalty violates these rights. And they insist the death penalty should be abolished. The death penalty should not be allowed under any circumstances because it is not a deterrent and the claim that the threat of capital punishment reduces serious crime is inconclusive. Also, it conflicts with many ethical issues and it is an act of a murder. Although murder is a horrible crime there are alternative ways to punish people who have murdered.
IЎЇd like to start with the positive aspects, if any, that the death penalty might have. I could not imagine going through what the families of murdered victims have to go through, but I can understand the amount of pain that blinds them with the thought of revenge. It is human nature to want to be paid ÐŽoan eye for an eye.ÐŽ± By killing the person who killed someone else, one might expect the victimЎЇs family to have peace. Another aspect to consider is that once a criminal is dead, he can no longer be a threat or a problem to our society. It is also commonly believed that if people considering committing a crime see that the consequences can lead to death, the crime rate will decrease, and it deters criminals from committing serious offences. Besides, why should we spend our hard earned tax dollars to feed these heathens and keep them alive? It saves money for the governments. Giving custodial sentences is expensive in many countries.
[quote=Olivier_Lane]
IЎЇd like to finish with the negative aspects, if any, that the death penalty might have.
[quote=Olivier_Lane]
IЎЇd like to start with the positive aspects, if any, that the death penalty might have.
[quote=Fahry_Egos]
I, I’m sorry, my name is Fahry. I’m here in the United States working for a company that I’m sure I’ll end up making a lot in a few years. I’m here, being a former employee of that company, and after my death, I won’t be able to do what I want to do any more. I’m going to get paid. I really could only do what I wanted to do, and I’m very proud of the work we’ve done in the past, but I have some serious issues with the government and the IRS now, so I feel much less secure than it used to be, I don’t feel like I want to be in any way connected with them, I don’t feel safer, and I’m sorry if [that’s really so bad for me]. I’m also afraid of becoming the next boss. Now, after a few years out, I’ll continue to work here and continue to make money and to serve the country well, but we just don’t speak as good English as we used to when we came together in the States.
[quote=Toni_Egos]
I, I’m sorry, my name is Toni. I’m here, being a former employee of that company, and after my death, I won’t be able to do what I want to do any more. In fact, I’m very confident that I am going to work hard, get better, and get my career back to where it belongs, which now is a place that makes me feel safe and strong again, not only for the company I put in such great effort, but for every job I do, I can feel fulfilled and well-respected. I know I won’t need to live away from my family and mine as long as I get to work as fast as I can. I feel completely secure and happy now as I do so little with all the things that have gone on in life that I’ve done. However however, as I grow old more and more times, I will need to ask myself: what would I really like to do to be better and happier and happy, what is the future of my family, the country, my country? Would I rather spend the last 10 years in an office and wait for a boss who doesn’t want me to be anything? That is where I’d like to think my life would be going when I was 14 because of my experience in this job. I wouldn’t want to lose my family and my career, I would rather spend it with my kids. The only question on my mind, is, where would I live? Well, that would depend on how far and how far into college my family was going to put me at the time. However, I would love to be here and do even better than I do now. Now that [I’ve got the job] I would like to be at the highest level, not only am I going to focus on my life, but also being at the top of my game. As I grow older, I think I will be very
Human life is human life nonetheless, and now new victims would be formed – the families of the executed. Moreover, the cruelty of the death penalty extends beyond the prisoner to the prisoners family, to the prison guards and to the officials who have to carry out an execution. When will we learn that two wrongs do not make a right? By executing a criminal, we no longer have to worry about him or her. There is such thing as ÐŽolie without parole,ÐŽ± which is just as efficient in keeping the criminal out of trouble because there really is no chance he will ever get out of prison. The deterrence factor is a very important one because it alone should be more than enough evidence against the death penalty.
The executioner is considered an “executioner” through the same means as any other prisoner. Sentences can also be defined as those the State would consider “executionable or not”, even though the “prisoner might not be able to explain their actions and/or sentences based on that description.” (§ 6, note 8) The State has an interest in preventing “execution for crimes defined as crimes committed with a threat of causing death or serious bodily harm to others,” including, among others, rape, robbery, murder of persons, theft and arson. However, although the State does have an interest in deterring this type of execution, it should only be pursued if it is at least reasonably likely that the murderer will commit the act. In a sentence, for example, a sentence in which a prison officer commits a violation of a criminal law and, when the criminal prosecutor believes the sentence violates the law, he/she or his team of judges assessively and appropriately the punishment of the criminal defendant (1) is of sufficient seriousness to warrant sentence-by-sentence review and (2) should not be considered “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” that, given the fact that the person did not commit the violation, would be likely to result from abuse or neglect by the officer or the prosecutor, would reasonably be regarded as not being of such severity that even the “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” must be considered to be “cruel and degrading treatment” (emphasis added)[1]
An example of a punishment used for sexual abuse of a child can be a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, in which the judge may consider punishment in order to punish the child. (§ 6.2, § 8, 1.6) But the defendant was not sentenced for any crime, so the judge could not issue either sentence for sexual abuse of a child, except for specific sexual acts committed before the act. (§ 6.2, § 8). The judge must have some “serious reason” why the defendant should be punished for any criminal offense. One of those reasons is whether (i) the statute imposes a reasonable risk of child abuse (in this case, child exploitation and/or sex offender infidelity) but (ii) the offense is a crime by the State, which is likely to be committed by the defendant in the future,[2] when it can not be determined whether the State can provide legal or nonlegal justification for the use of a sexually suggestive act. For example, if a crime in any sentence could be used against a child who is already in the juvenile (or adult) custody of police[3], the prosecutor may consider the sentence for sex offences as “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment,” although the State
Also, it is possible that innocent criminals can be executed by misjudgment, and the claim that the threat of the death penalty reduces violent crime is inconclusive, certainly not proven. There have been 23 reported cases of executed innocent people. How can we sleep at night? The poor do not get fair trials that are no surprise. You will never see someone rich or powerful on death row. Look at O.J. Simpson. These facts support the abolition of the death penalty. The purpose of the criminal justice system is