How the United States Got Invovled in Ww2
Essay Preview: How the United States Got Invovled in Ww2
Report this essay
How and Why the United States Got Involved
The conflict in Vietnam which is also called the Ten Thousand-Day War was an ongoing battle from 1945 to 1975. In the 30 years of fighting, the United States would lose over 57,000 men while Vietnamese dead numbered two million. American involvement officially began in 1950 when the US government recognized the Bao Dai government and began sending the French aid to fight off the communist backed Viet Minh led by Ho Chi Minh. The French lost the war because it was not fully committed to a “win” policy. The Bao Dai, anti-Communist nationalist alternative, whom the Truman and Eisenhower Administrations had backed, had failed to undercut the appeal of the Viet Minh. The price of peace involved the surrendering of some portion of the country to the Communists, and the United States could not oppose since it had not become deeply involved. The United States instead placed its hopes on a “new anti-Communist nationalist alternative” and his name was Ngo Dinh Diem. Diem accepted the offer and in 1954 his government was formally organized. This started a new phase of U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Senator John F. Kennedy recommended, in order to prevent the further spread of communism in Southeast Asia, that the French grant independence to South Vietnam, support the governments army, and “whenever necessary to make some commitment of our manpower.
During the first year of the new government, Diem crushed all sources of opposition left over from the Viet Minh. By 1959, in the North, the Viet Minh had written off the possibility of the elections that they were supposed to get and turned to military means. This ended the illusory stability of the Diem regime. Diem was aware that his government could not survive without the massive aid from the United States so he based his whole appeal on anti-communism. But then, with the “Communist danger” the basis for assuring continued American aid, the “secure” countryside suddenly was overrun with “Communist terrorists”. In 1961 Edward Landsdale was sent to Vietnam to make an over-all study of the situation. He reported that the situation was near total collapse and that if the policies of the Diem government and its advisers continued to be pursued the country would soon be lost. It was then decided to increase the Vietnamese Army from 150,000 to 250,000, which was a direct violation of the Geneva Accords, to concentrate its training on counter-insurgency. The final incidents that led to the coup were a train of abuses, no single one of which was necessarily more important than any other, even though the dramatic Buddhist crisis is frequently cited as the final straw; it was one straw, a dramatic on. On November 1, the generals staged a coup and in the end Diem was killed (Trager 179). In the spring of 1961, the magazine press began to revise its picture of Diems government (Scheer 66). Jerry Rose, who was an expert on Vietnam, accepted the containment policy after Diems removal and supported the overriding necessity for stopping the spread of communism in Vietnam. He says: To sum up: one solution now for the U.S. appears to be a show of power in South Vietnam which would pave the way toward a compromising settlement. But is the risk of a power-play warranted? Southeast Asia has been likened to “a set of dominos.” If South Vietnam falls; the rest of the blocks go, too. It would seem, therefore, that it is in the high interest of the U.S., as a leader and a system of government, to risk much in stabilizing that tottering block (Scheer 76-77). After Diems government was ousted, President Johnson had to decide afresh the new