Essay About Use Of Blind Measurement And Quantitative Data

Adjuvant Exemestane with Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Breast Cancer
Adjuvant Exemestane with Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Breast Cancer
Adjuvant Exemestane with Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Breast CancerHypothesis: The hypothesis of the article: “Adjuvant Exemestane with Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Breast Cancer” is that an aromatase inhibitor improves outcomes, as compared with tamoxifen, in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive to breast cancer. Testing to see the Adjuvant Exemestane ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. Testing the Hypothesis which is considered the experiment:Five Factors needed for it to be a well-designed experiment:Large sample size: The study included 4690 patients in two trails. Good sample size.Using an experimental and controlled group: They the patients were selected randomly to get the adjuvant treatment and tamoxifen. This was controlled for 5 years. They had those who took adjuvant treatment and those who were given tamoxifen. Quantitative data: Throughout the whole article they use quantitative data in representing their statistical analysis of their findings. Use of blind measurement: The use of blind measurement was used in the view of giving the women different treatments like that of Tamoxifen and adjuvant treatment for a period of 5 years. They were randomly selected. Reproducibility: I feel like if this was meant to be re done it would be possible. This experiment is able to be redone again if needed.Conclusion: The studies show in premenopausal women with hormone-receptor–positive early breast cancer, adjuvant treatment with exemestane plus ovarian suppression, as compared with tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression, significantly reduced recurrence.Their conclusion seems reasonable since there wasn’t a big of a change in the results. But most experiments have some change even if it’s little. This experiment was done for 5 years so the results where taken over a good period of time. They compared two different methods. The reason this is a good one would be that they can reproduce it over and over again if they had too.