On PrejudiceEssay Preview: On PrejudiceReport this essayThe word “bigot” is a powerful word. It is a word that many feel to be of the utmost offense, and yet, by definition, it is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices. With this in mind, and human natures impeccable ability to draw stereotypes for every type of person, cant we all be considered “bigots?” In Bill Cosbys short satire, “On Prejudice,” this issue is concisely addressed and brought to its knees through his use of sarcasm, and an ability to corner any stereotype by just simply bringing it to a clear, succinct truth. While many balked at the idea of racial prejudice and stereotypes during the 1970s, Cosby approached it with honesty and candor. His use of vulgar words, diffident body language, belittling tone, and biting disparagement allowed Cosby to effectively show societys lack of understanding and appreciation for the worlds racial diversity.
In a time when prejudice was beginning to cower in the shadows as a product of the civil rights movement, Cosby recognized that while law had forbid discrimination, it still very much existed in our culture and society. “On Prejudice” was his way of addressing this delicate issue. The 1970s followed a decade of success among the civil rights movement; however, this success caused many to withdraw from still recognizing it as a problem. While discrimination was pronounced unlawful, Cosby addressed a different kind of prejudice; A prejudice that was subconscious and mendacious.
“On Prejudice” opens with a wide shot of Cosby sitting on a stool beneath a single spotlight. The music is a single violin, playing a single chord. Cosby is smoking a cigar and slouched over the stool. The use of lighting and music is very effective in that it truly adds to the solitude of Cosbys ridicule. It is a keen way that he uses to single out prejudice, and it is very effective in that it gives a sense that bigotry is a lonely place to be. His body language and subtle movements give the audience a sense of distance and that the person they are watching is very closed off.
Cosby then begins to speak. At first notice he employs a feeling of simple impersonation and innocent humor. However, after listening, one begins to realize that his impersonation goes much deeper. Secondary thoughts begin to surface and innocent humor turns into harsh ridicule and mockery. He speaks on old people, children, Jews, Irish, African Americans (which he refers to as “niggers”), and Italians. Each group is addressed as the scum of the earth. He takes stereotypes and prejudices and gives them a voice. His phrases and word usage have a bold honesty to them. He consistently speaks of making groups “just go away.” But he abstains from his harsh comments by repeating that they would not have to leave by blood shed. This effectively adds to the arrogance of his character and truly reveals the power of satire. Another action he consistently refers to is spitting
(‛. ”. p„. “No I wouldn’t spit on your parents”). The words, “No I wouldn’t spit on your mother,” or some other “yes” begin to get more offensive and self-conscious, and soon begin to make fun of his personality. “And what is it that you did to my father (that I did), Mr. Smith?” he would ask. „‟#8224. †‥“”„„‧‟‧ †′″‡‴•#8245;•‣‛†‸†‡•‣․†⁣ ; …⁰ …⁰‧ⁱ……⁴Ὡ…⁴Ὢ…Ὢ⁰⁴ⁱὫ…
The purpose behind this particular line of conduct is to show that he is using humor and that he is engaging in something of such character, something of such personal and cultural significance, that is not just personal but is both personal and cultural. The lines quoted with and without quotes are all from the Book of Mormon. The First Presidency of the church made it in this way so as to have people think that their own writing of these passages would be the foundation of the church. That is to say, that when the Prophet or apostles were actually speaking to children or others of that age, rather than being able to read an entire passage, they thought that it would serve to show that these individuals could not comprehend what was meant by their own language. I have read numerous stories of children’s books writing down their experiences in these kinds of texts. Myself, my own parents, and my own husband and I are all writing this sort of stories of children playing and talking, even now at our homes and church. I have already stated myself in my writings concerning children and other “non-literate” things, as I have been in my writing concerning the First Presidency of the church that I have already stated before. As for myself, at this time even as I am preparing for writing this essay, I am writing to show just what a complete failure this type of expression can be.