Conflict in Darfur
Running Head: CONFLICT IN DARFUR
Conflict in Darfur
[Writer Name]
[Institute Name]
Conflict in Darfur
Introduction
Darfur is a place in Sudan. Darfur is an sovereign sultanate for many times, by the forces of Anglo Egyptian it was included in Sudan. This place is divided into 3 states, South Darfur, North Darfur and West Darfur which are organized through a Transitional Darfur Regional Authority. Because of the Darfur War waged by the government of Sudan in opposition to the non Arab native inhabitants and since 2003, the area has been in a region of war emergency. About this issue the realists and liberalists having very differences in their views.
Discussion
From the foreign strategy of President George W. Bush was illustrated by a permanent war and conflict for power between Vice President Dick Cheney and realists based mostly in the State Department and community of intelligence, since two years, the Pentagon, so the next management might locate itself divide with ideological lines. The elected President Barrack Obama has done well in recruiting a extraordinarily wide series of advisers about foreign strategy, some of whom are being located in leading strategy, creating positions and arrangements, and others, mainly “graybeards” as earlier national safety consultants Brent Scowcroft, Anthony Lake and Zbigniew Brzezinski and previous Rep. Lee Hamilton, will likely propose their suggestion on a extra unofficial basis .
That collection runs from extremely realists characterized by Scowcroft, whose two protégés, Gen. James Jones and Robert Gates, will become the head of Pentagon Department and also the consultant of national security, in that order, to liberal and moderate internationalists, some of whom, in which the Ambassador of UN, Susan Rice and Vice President Joe Biden, have strongly stated on hawkish point of views. State Secretary, Hillary Clinton is also include, whose failure of the Democratic nomination of president to Obama was likely because of her great support of the Iraq attack in 2003 as any other issues .
In the previous several periods, and mainly since the war of Iraq went south in the late year of 2003, the two major parties have been combined in refusing the unilateralism and practically exclusive reliance on the hazard and the exercise of forces in a sense of hard power that controlled the first time of Bush foreign strategy in particular. On the other hand, they have reached on the common commitment and assurance to multilateralism and the exercise of diplomacy and different other kinds of flexible power, so, as a first