What Does the Victorian Attitude to Death Tell Us About the Period?Essay Preview: What Does the Victorian Attitude to Death Tell Us About the Period?Report this essayWhat does the Victorian attitude to death tell us about the period?The Victorians attitude to death was multi-faceted. They believed in Are Morendi, death was very commercial during that period. Death was virulent and the process of burial or cremation was very ritualistic. During the period, death became more medicalised and there were changes to how each different religion treated death.
Death was virulent in Victorian Britain; it “surrounded the Victorians Ð- at home and in the streets” as a result of this Ðcure all pills became fashionable. These were pills that claimed to cure everything from backache to typhoid. In London almost a quarter of children died before they reached aged 5, this figure decreased a little when you went out of London, except in Bradford which had the highest infant death rate in the whole of England Families were so used to children dying young that they took a while before they named them, often just referring to them as baby until they to a few years old or the next child came along. Death was so commonplace that the etiquette of what to do when calling round a family that had recently had a deceased, was in Mrs Beetonss Book of Household Management, which was the middle class wifes bible on how to behave.
Death for the Victorians was very ritualistic, from the dress to the funeral procession. Vaults had been popular before the Victorian age but now became a fashion and social statement; they were a way of showing wealth. There was a strict dress code that was mostly for women during the mourning period. Full mourning had to be worn from the day of the funeral for a year if it was for immediate family, then half mourning for another 6 months, then after that it was appropriate for people to wear colourful clothes and continue with their life. For other relations, it was half mourning for six to nine months. There were rules about stationary during the mourning period, hatband width for men and other such minute details that had to be kept to for at least appearances sake. This was often for the dual purpose of showing respect for the dead, allowing time for grief and showing status. The rich women went into mourning for the full time to show that they had been well cared for and they had no need to immediately remarry, as marriage was the only way for women to survive. Women that came out of mourning early and remarried were seen as unfeeling or as being left poor. Working class women did not often have the luxury of going into mourning for long, they would dye an old dress black and wear it for as long as possible and remarry if possible but they would carry on working, as they would often be the main provider for the family. Other rituals regarding the death process were less strict. The time from death to burial changed depending on the season and on weather the family had enough space in the house for the body to be kept in another room (the poor families often had to sleep in the same room as the dead until the burial). The funeral procession gradually changed over the period, as technology advanced. It went from black horse-drawn hearses from the home to the cemetery, to funeral carts on the railway from the home across the country by rail to the home of the deceased and their chosen cemetery. It was customary for the friends and relatives of the deceased to visit the body before the funeral, this came from before medical advancements, to check that it was who it was claimed to be and that the person was actually dead, connected to that was the practice of putting bells on gravestones in case the person was buried alive that declined.
Death was hugely commercial during the Victorian period. The horses that were used for the funeral procession were black and imported mostly from Holland and Belgium. They were imported before they were three years old and quickly trained for the job, if they could not be trained or did not have the temperament they were sold on at a suitable age for traditional training. The horses would work for six years then be sold to the Knackers yard. They were such a symbol that if there was a big funeral and there were other colours in the funeral procession then there was uproar, but it was mostly a status symbol than a religious necessity for most people, except the Roman Catholics. The cost of burials was huge; the family had to pay for the church, the procession and the plot or vault. Monuments were aspired to by most families but there was always a lot of red-tape. The cemeteries would only allow certain areas to have set height, style and stone of monuments, and the requests for them had to be put to the owners soon after the burial, and the owners had final say so the family had to have influence and/or money to get what they wanted, the best plot, the best monuments and the best stone. Another commercial aspect of Victorian death were notices in the newspapers announcing the death of someone, and sending cards to immediate family, this shows how much the Victorian family cared about the person, and the bigger the notice the more important and/or wealthy the person was. All of it was about showing wealth, status and basically showing off to the world and preserving the memory of the dead person. A famous company that dealt with almost every aspect of the commercialisation of death was Dotteridges. It was a large firm based in London, it had roughly 80 black horses, housed in separate stables from the normal coloured horses. It dealt with post regarding death, the monuments (style and stone), and the caskets. It became big because it could deal with everything and became fashionable and so got more business, and was said to have the “contract for burying all the Jews of London”
The Victorians were obsessed with the idea of the Good Death. They wanted their family around them. When Mary Curzon (wife of Lord Curzon) died she “said that she did not to want to see the children till the end” while she was dying she gave her husband instructions about how to bury her, where she wanted the children to go and towards the end she asked Lord Curzon to read their favourite psalm. This is indicative of the Victorian belief in Christianity and that they if the family around them then God would see that they had had a good life and were much loved and would invite them into heaven. The idea of Purgatory had almost disappeared in the Victorian era, it was replaced by the idea that death was a release
.\r
There was no such book in the 17th century, but the story could be told at some intervals
the story began in 1895, a month after the story ended and the children were put in Purgatory in May.
It is well known that, within the Victorian era, there was an effort to destroy the Catholic church
by persecuting Protestants under the law of 1663[.>\r
By attacking these, the Victorian Government was attempting to establish a Christian middle class and social base that was in danger when we were under the law of 1664.”
S. R. R. R. (1878) wrote: “It is known that the English Catholics were not at all eager to be Christians. The idea that they were ready to be Catholics was very common in the beginning. The idea was that one who refused to believe in any of the Christian doctrines was in danger. The Catholics could not see the evil of any of the doctrines on that account, but they were anxious for a safe and prosperous society. They felt it necessary to show the English people that there was no real danger, and for that reason thought was a sure way to destroy Catholicism, to which they replied by preaching to the Saints that they would never let one come to England in England and that if it showed that England was not safe then to take him away, they should kill him.”
(1755)
“The Catholic Church was very bad at preventing Christian converts.
It became so dangerous, in 1844, for three days a week, that a little girl was killed in a pub in Hampstead which was called the Temple. She was sent to the Lord for her baptism, not for the church but after the church. He sent a minister before her and the children, who attended in silence, had to be placed in the church. They asked the Bishop of London for their religion on their way by this journey, which involved the death of the priest, and there was an outcry of outrage from the people.”
(1874)
[T]he Protestant League, a large and formidable force in England, attempted to arrest the Catholic preacher at London, but he was killed at Heathrow. The Church of England kept him from coming at all to the Lord at London, and he never returned.
]
For the remainder of the nineteenth century, the Church of England was in the greatest need and power, and in the course of fighting it won. As a result it was able to have a great effect over the whole continent of Africa,[.>\r
<