Visual Images in Jfk
Essay Preview: Visual Images in Jfk
Report this essay
The release of JFK was a crucial moment in the account of motion pictures just as the events it portrays divided politics. Prior to JFK it would have been awfully hard to sell a political film in which the reality is issue, perverse, deformed, and in the end found impossible, in which the title character is murdered before the opening credits end rolling. Oliver Stones film has the classic anecdote, visual scale and gist to match; not simply a fascinating real-life plot thriller, but also an allegory for the fall of the American dream. JFK storys centers Jim Garrison, region legal representative, who probes the Presidents murder. JFK asserts to divulge the real truth concerning the Kennedy murder.
Oliver Stones mastery of a diversity of visual styles, editing, along with concurrence makes JFK more or less seem interactive. This movie won Oscars for Best Cinematography and Editing. This movie integrates scores of diverse styles, film stocks, and pace to craft an intact that seems pieced collectively from shreds of reminiscences and deception. It provokes to make points and attempt to work them out. Stone and his skilled cinematographer, Robert Richardson, work in each pertinent visual medium: 35mm, 16mm, Super 8, 8mm, video, still photos, color, black and white.
This is a film in which the real and the imagined, fact and fiction, keep shading into one another. (Auchincloss 1991: 47) This provokes the already mentioned alertness in the viewer, since JFK with its visual patchwork “challenges the spectator to confront the simple and problematic distinction between documentary and fiction. Indeed, the films political implications reside in part in how it succeeds at posing this challenge, in whether it prompts viewers to consider how central to the writing of history are questions about access to and organization of images” (Simon 1996: 215).
JFK movies like a high tech suspenseful story which merges the most fascinating photography as well as impressive editing ever seen in action pictures. The thrilling visual effects the temperamental lighting; feral camera angles; assorted film accumulation; color, black and white, and sepia blends; videos; computer graphics and morphing; animatronics and cartoons; gritty old newsreels, blinking, glistening, and enduring on the screen light up the obscurity and inconsistency of character confronting fate, of will forced on destiny.
“Much of the supremacy of this film comes from its editing. Scrutinize the editing and shot masterpiece of subsequent sequences and enlighten the editings effect, its capability to offer commentary through the succession of metaphors”. White, Hayden (1996), The Modernist Event in Sobchack, Vivian (1996).
The story of JFK endeavors to tie together the distinct strands of the multifaceted assassination case in the figure of Jim Garrison. However the elaborate and assorted clutter of images and the nonlinear tableau of incongruent time frames and its swift alterations of visual perceptions often functions as an undermining counterpoint to a narration that endeavors for precision. Though the narrative monologues of X and Garrison endeavor to gather the plot strands into a seamless stability, the images often oppose what is being narrated and push haziness into the forefront. And it is specifically the inconsistent relation of epistemological conviction and concern which is adorned in the stress between voice track and image track. It is due to the need of a reliable prototype for the consumption of diverse film stocks that this volatility of the image track is interpreted.
Here Ill discuss some scene which discuss about the visual style of the movie.
The scenes of definite newsreel footage in black and white are mixed together with Stones gathered soundtrack, varying in swift sequence so that the audience is escorted to deem they witness purpose history presented on screen. In the beginning, the commentary accompanying the movie or shots seems to be that of a critic