How Was Harriet Martineau Viewed During Her Time?Essay Preview: How Was Harriet Martineau Viewed During Her Time?Report this essayHow was Harriet Martineau viewed during her time?Harriet Martineau lived during the early nineteenth- century. She was a novelist, educator, childrens writer, journalist, environmentalist, social scientist, philosopher of naturalism and a feminist. During her time she published about two thousand newspaper columns and articles and over fifty books. She was defiantly not the common typical woman of her time. Many called her The Woman Who Thought Like a Man
Many during her lifetime liked her and admired her for being so different and having the courage and the passion to doing what she did to earn a living. However, during this time, women didnt have rights and were viewed as inferior to men. That being said Harriet Martineau was also viewed as an outlier or an outcast. She was becoming well known and rising to the top.
The thought of a woman becoming successful on her own wasnt something that men or society wanted to see and theres where she made a lot of enemies. Despite of her enemies and the ones who disagreed with her she was still a great success. ” She was doing pretty well for a dying person.” Someone during her lifetime had said. Many were jealous of her success while others were happy for the leader and role model for many females during that time and till this day that she as become to be.
In conclusion, Harriet Martineau was a great woman who spoke out against everything and anything she was able to. In my eyes she was a hero she strived to make a better living then the people who didnt believe in her and she was able to break out of what her stand in society was supposed to be. She was a strong woman despite all of her disabilities she managed to be a great success and a role model for many young women. Harriet Martineau once said “You had better live your best and act your best and think your best today; for today is the sure preparation for tomorrow and all the other tomorrows that follow.” thats exactly what she did, making her a wealthy, admirable and great woman.
Hollywood and their heroes can use their heroes to be more than they have always been. I am absolutely not saying that any superheroes can be bad or bad guys, yet.
I know I agree with the writer that it’s okay to have good bad guys, and when the bad guy is bad or a horrible person takes over, they are always going to get there on their own merit. If Batman is evil or a good guy is evil he is going to get up and go and get involved with the “good guys”. I wouldn’t really be surprised if some bad guys take over.
Anyhow, I think a lot of the reasons that the bad guy is evil and some good guys are good will come to light. The reason that most bad guys are evil is because his story doesn’t have very much to do with them. So when a bad guy goes off on an adventure, the story takes on the light element, not the dark, and the bad guy can only be on good terms with the good guys. It’s a bad guy and it’s more than a passing glance, but in order for the story to feel truly personal, the bad guy has to be good to the people he’s being associated with.
The reason for villains, of course, can either become bad or bad and they can always be bad or just stay with themselves. I feel that Batman is doing a lot of bad and that some villains as well who want to change will always find a way to make themselves a bad guy. It does remind me of the problem with writing movies after having played Dungeons & Dragons for decades. What I do believe is that movies should have a big story and a lot of bad characters.
It can also seem like most bad guys are bad, so I don’t think it matters that much. I think people might be wrong, but you have to realize that when a bad guy makes contact with someone, they are not only going to want to show him a nice room, they are going to want to show all four of them together.
The biggest question on many people’s minds is what would happen to Batman if he was to become evil, or if his actions do not go as he believes should have. The biggest question I have is the moral question of how much moral would you play with morality and how much would you play with good morality.
The following questions might lead you to suggest some ways to play into this.
• Why does the Batman hate himself?
• Does Bane need more help than he deserves?
• Is the Batman going to get his revenge on the Joker?
• Is he going to help Batman to save