Waste Management Regulations and Laws in IndiaEssay Preview: Waste Management Regulations and Laws in IndiaReport this essayThe concept of waste management starts with generation of waste and concludes with its final disposal, including processes like its storage, compilation, locomotion and processing. It is a basic public necessity and this service is provided by the respective urban local bodies. The Municipal Solid Wastes (Management & Handling) Rules, 2000 were the first such step which directed municipal authorities to take the appropriate and necessary steps for waste management in India. More such laws are needed and a system to check their enforceability has to be put in place too. A better regulatory framework for the protection of the environment through careful scrutiny of the waste disposal and generation is the need of the hour, and for that, an effective environmental legislation is required to this effect. This would also affect positively the quality of life and raise the basic standards of living in India.
This paper focuses on the existing and recommended laws to be implemented in primarily third world countries for safer and better waste management. The general public of India is currently living at a time of unprecedented economic growth and altering lifestyles. Unsanitary environment will amplify the divide between their expectations due to the rapidly changing perception of their being and where they belong and the prevailing conditions, resulting in plunging quality of life. The necessity of stricter laws regarding waste disposal and its management has never been greater. This paper would also compare the laws present in first world or developed countries to the ones active in under-developed countries thereby suggesting solutions and measures need to be taken for proper waste management and the amendments and new laws that may be required.
PREFACE
In recent years the US, which is the world’s most polluted country, has been moving towards more lax laws and regulations for public welfare. Such in-depth research from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that only the first five years of the 21st century, such as 1990 and 2010, are full of massive increases in environmental pollution. Therefore, more stringent public welfare legislation in the United States could result in the massive increase in U.S. pollution levels.
Although many in Congress and world government want to reduce public welfare by implementing the most stringent regulatory framework, it is a difficult task. One of the best and most widely used methods is the “consolidation” approach. This takes the focus off of the environmental issues and instead concentrates on the problems and their solutions to address. Conventional public welfare legislation also creates more opportunities for more “consolidation” and creates a level playing field.
For example, on a number of occasions the US has imposed the largest single-payer health care system in the world, requiring millions to pay for insurance without any additional funds being invested in it. As a result of this inefficiencies, the United States government subsidizes a significant share of health expenditures, and the share goes towards ensuring that people continue to access health care in the United States for all citizens.
The Federal government subsidizes health care benefits. In addition to the federal Medicare program for private individuals and businesses, states and local governments in the United States may provide reimbursement of specific health care benefits that their residents receive over extended periods of time through an expanded use of Medicare to pay for private health care. A major part of this benefit is called the “health insurance premium”. This represents a premium on top of all of the government’s health expenditures. This is a large portion of the entire public health budget, but does not cover a small number of uninsured Americans who are considered to be at high risk of health problems such as congestive heart failure.
For this reason, Congress and others must act to ensure that Americans are paid their fair share of the cost of health care by providing health care in the United States. It has never been more important to the United States that it follow international standard of care.
For example, this legislation would require that all federally licensed private health care facilities and services that supply health care to U.S. residents under $75,000 of income must provide an additional $200 per capita to cover coverage for that amount of health care expenditures. We also believe that providing health care services to U.S. residents is a matter of public safety and is at the government’s personal disposal. These are important and public safety issues that must be taken into account when making final regulatory decisions regarding policies, programs, and services to make us safer.
Additionally, the United States should be encouraged to continue to establish and enhance other health care delivery systems in the United States. The United States is one of the few developed countries that supports health care in areas such as education, healthcare, and health insurance for all its citizens and as part of our efforts to ensure a free, transparent and public healthcare system for all Americans. Such systems could include, but are not limited to, an innovative care delivery system or the health care delivery of the United States through a national health service delivery system to those who have no existing health coverage, as well as an ongoing program to meet the most needs of Americans.
Finally, we support the