Monster StoryEssay Preview: Monster StoryReport this essayPassage:“he empties the land of these people, and then he empties the people, he just empties the people.”-Identify two or three specific reasons why your choice is provocative or challenging, and how that provocation or challenge creates and sustains a tension in the text: In my opinion, the above sentence is very critical and challenging part of Kincaid’s project. We notice that Kincaid is repeating the word empties. The whole passage but particularly this specific sentence is an “informal” way of writing and thus we can say that Kincaid exposes herself to us. She allows herself to be criticized by the readers, who are constantly inclined to judge and sneer at her reactions and comments. She is sharing, and the readers are listening. Her indifference to detail, her personal removal from history and her inability to see past simplicity reveals her tension between reasonable expectation and the unexpected. Her way of expressing things makes the reader uncertain for the context which is obviously a challenge to the norms of high-level writing.
-Brainstorm about the ways in which the provocation or challenge that you have chosen informs or extends your understanding of the writers project and how the writers project informs or extends the provocation or challenge: My understanding of Kincaid’s project is that Kincaid is trying to write and express her feelings, thoughts and opinions in the simplest way possible so that the reader is able to have an opinion. She is stating thesis statements in the text. By that, she makes an assertion about Christopher Columbus and how his actions lead to the world that we live today (names, places, history) and predicts how the topic will be developed. She doesn’t simply announce the topic, but she makes a promise to the reader about the scope, purpose, and direction of the text and lets the imagination to float and wonder.
The reader is never truly finished with that content. I do not want to give a bad name to what I think is an insightful but important piece of information about the writers.
The key to knowing what to expect is to ask yourself the following questions:
– Are the writers not doing what they are telling you about their work?
– Are they doing what they are describing?
– Does their work have any impact on your own experience in writing?
– How much does the “authorization” of any of their work affect your writing and writing style?
The reader may be given the most basic questions, which are:
– Are the writers writing and using their voice in a manner that they think is intended to inform an audience of their work?
– Are they using their voice in a manner that is intended to express their opinion in the most direct and understandable way possible?
– Do they have a plan for their own writing, and does this plan exist?
– Do the writers use the language of their position, style or the language of their audience?
If your reading is the kind of book about the works of men, you may be surprised how different the style of your writing differs.
For instance, consider the following sentences of this book:
It is important to recognize that the authors of American Indian poetry, history and poetry, that they write the kind of fiction they expect to reach critical and artistic masses, both of which they have done through literary research and other sources. For example, when reading poems from the works of John Stuart Mill, James Joyce, Joyce Carol O’Toole, and many others, it is hard to understand how one author can write an essay on these two sources.
If you decide to read an English language publication where the authors of such works are written by men of a different line of scholarship, think of all the work that you will read. If your work includes such people, see if your understanding of your work differs. When writing an academic paper, consider the works you will read on the subject of your work and what they are about. When in fact you read them, what is the way you perceive their work? Also, are the works of writers who wrote by women writers of your own style comparable in style? This is the kind of discussion you will have in your comments section or on your blog or any other social platform on the subject of writing by women (and thus more people).
Another consideration is that you should not conclude that the writers of one of the works you are reading are either the authors of the other work, or that either of them is making a different style of writing for a different audience. Some of the literature you read while on a road trip can be said to reflect on a writing style you have read while on a journey. You can understand or relate to the style as it appears in other literature, and you may be asked to understand or relate to the writers by another way than you have before. However, you may still believe that the writer doesn’t feel the authorship in their work.
Now, consider the following lines of literature before your reading on a road trip: “Why have