The Guardians of the World Order Have Sought to Establish Democracy in one Sense of the Term, While Blocking It in a Different Sense (chomsky). Discuss.
Essay Preview: The Guardians of the World Order Have Sought to Establish Democracy in one Sense of the Term, While Blocking It in a Different Sense (chomsky). Discuss.
Report this essayChomsky is one of the most astute and notorious outspoken critic of liberal democracy that is promoted by the guardians of the world order or simply the western world. He especially direct his criticisms towards the United States and the United Kingdom who seek to establish democracy all over the world in order to have some sort of control over the people either for political or material reasons . Hence Chomsky sees this campaign to establish democracy as a tool of oppression instead of a means of emancipation.
Following the collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union many have argued that western liberal democracy is the best form of government and ideally suited to the modern world. Some even claim that it is the moral leader of the world. Parekh describes democracy as “defined and structured within the limits set by liberalism.” Liberalism preceded democracy by nearly two centuries. Thus, a society had to be created where the latter had to adjust. Liberalism today is the absolute premise and foundation that shapes the democratic character. Therefore, during the last three decades the Orthodox notion of democracy is advocated and promoted by western agencies, international organisation and local elites to constitute a western neo-liberal, technical notion of democracy. Western institution and the ideals they embody are presented as universal but such claims are highly contested because “the proper use of which, inevitably involves endless dispute about their proper use on the part of their users.” This is therefore the reason why Chomsky sees this promotion of democracy as a method of controlling that is used by the guardians of the world.
In its pure form liberal democracy promotes a form of representative democracy where elected representatives that hold the decision of power are moderated by a constitution that emphasizes protecting individual liberties and the rights of minorities in society, such as freedom of speech and assembly, freedom of religion the right to private property and privacy as well as equality before the law. However a close examination seems to suggest that liberal democracy is not democratic or liberal at all because liberal democracy does not respect majority rule except when citizens are asked to vote for their representatives. Liberal democracy merely allows political competition between supposedly equal citizens without taking into account the unequal resources that citizens possess. The elite section of the society enjoys superior wealth; contact, education or political skill in general may thus be able to carry on its privileges at the expense of the majority by manipulating the key political institution and the media, and influencing the public opinion so as to minimize public debate on issues, which brings its privileges into question. On the other hand others would argue that only liberal democracy could guarantee the individual liberties of its citizens and prevent the development into dictatorship.
In the western countries where the wealthier section of the population are numerically over-represented in executive and legislative bodies, and source of inequality, such as “inherited wealth, private profit from land and profit capital” which owe more to “imperfect markets than entrepreneurial skill.” However this imperfect ideology of democracy does not stop the western world wanting to spread it in order to exploit poorer countries where the call for democracy is so overwhelming. As a result of this Chomskys criticisms of the guardian of the world seems to be echoed by many nationalist politicians in the Third World who have experienced foreign exploitation. Thus they request not just a set of rules to govern political competition, but also a means of achieving greater social and economic equality. To them, liberal democracy may offer an inadequate solution to their perceived injustices.
The Third World and Western European states have a long-held view of the role and role of women & other minorities in the development of society, and it is important to discuss their views of these states at the time when the Third World and European nations see their role in the development of societies and in political life. While their view is certainly on the same side with the Western countries, their view is somewhat divergent from those of the Western countries and is based on their own personal experiences and preferences, thus making it difficult to agree on who should hold the leadership position in all aspects of politics, especially when considering the way the state is organized. According to this view, women and minorities can take the lead in matters of society, especially when compared to the men in a capitalist system. In particular, they can act in an often repressive and hierarchical manner, while on the one hand the women tend to be more egalitarian in their behaviour, and, in fact, are very influential towards the establishment of political parties, and thus support, are more important than women of any political party.
According to this view, women also help to bring about positive changes in society – as both a result of increased freedom, and the fact that they have free rein to choose and not to face patriarchal domination and inequality (where it should be understood that women control the leadership and power of the state by means of the “power of their will” and those in charge of the state are also women, though often this is not reciprocated), and the need for social change. A central theme of their view of the role of women, however, is their role in building social and political institutions in the Western country since it is considered here that the need to establish an inclusive and democratic structure as the state is important. This is reflected in the ways that they often work with the police to arrest and deport poor people who were seen as working in poor conditions and in poor villages (as a way to facilitate social change in these places that women are often excluded from in-country life by virtue of their status, position and economic status). In addition, those women who seek out opportunities through working hard together and working for other people can lead the women of the region into political and social action where they can have greater influence, especially in the area of economic development, for the benefit of those living in poor communities. The idea of women influencing the local politics is very similar to the concept of “socialism”, in that men lead only in a social and economic democratic way, women are called upon to lead a progressive society by women, etc.
The Third World and Eastern Europe as A National Identity
In the Third World there are those who view the Western democracies as an idealistic and corrupt system based on social injustice, and which seeks to bring about racial differences between the sexes and other minorities (see the above section on the term racial difference: this is one specific aspect of human race which will be highlighted in later sections as well as on other features of human race and their human rights). In Western societies these values have generally been taken to mean that certain elements of society need to be put into balance according to their respective conceptions and values.
One’s own sense of the role of the state, for example how the state operates to ensure equal treatment of the population and what is expected of citizens in areas with a dominant position as the rulers of society, reflects a lot of these values. Western political and social cultures often hold that women are the main problem and the solution to the many problems that people face including poverty, violence, lack of education and other related issues. In this sense, Western societies are quite different from one another so they try
Therefore, the western world by this meaning the United States see the nationalistic regime as a immense threat because they are responsive to popular pressure for “immediate improvement in the low living standards of the masses and diversification of the economies. As discussed above, although the western worlds were supposed to establish democracy and emancipate nations from the terrible situation they are placed under; may be due to an awful dictatorial regime. Instead, the Third world was to be exploited for the needs of the industrial capitalist of the western world in order to fulfil its major function as a source of raw materials and markets.
With reference to In Latin America, Kennan an American State Department Policy Planning Staff explained the the protection of our resources must be a major concern as elsewhere. By this he meant that if America does not posses some kind of control over Latin America, the United States would lose some of its great source of materials such us timber and oil. Therefore they use the excuse of establishing democracy as a technique to control over these poor countries. On the contrary of what a liberal democracy should bring to a nation, it seems that the guardians of the world use this method to maintain whatever interests they hold over a certain country.
The United States celebrated their achievements in promoting democracy with free election in Guatemala and El Salvador. However this was achieved after a wave of “slaughter, torture, disappearance, mutilation and physical destruction the independent media and murders of editors and journalist by the security forces.” Nevertheless the United Sates failed to comment how that so-called democracy was established. Although we are indeed inspired by a yearning for democracy, as the New York times tells us, but for we should never forget that we mean democracy in the proper sense. This clearly proves Chomskys theory of the western world using the ideology of democracy as a method of controlling a nation in order to achieve whatever agenda they have planed.
In Africa talk of democracy today is widespread but usually bankrupt. The western world represents democracy as choosing between A and B, but not as having an equal part in determining the choices. Western institution and the ideals they embody are presented as universal but such claims are highly contested. As Parker has noted, claims to universality “have aroused