Sexual Violence Against African-American Women: Beyond Slavery, Beyond the PhysicalSexual Violence Against African-American Women: Beyond Slavery, Beyond the PhysicalThe Civil War literally changed the “landscape” of America overnight. At least 600,000 men, both Union and Confederate, never returned to their families. Five years of separation forced the North and South to live as “one”. In theory, slaves became freedmen and equal to their white counterparts. Post-bellum America was difficult for everyone, but it was the South who endured the most hardship. Southern Democrats were now at the mercy of Northern Republicans, forced to rebuild their governments with the federal “blueprint” in mind. Former government officials and property-owners found themselves powerless and landless, respectively. The plantation economy of the South fell victim to out-sourcing, overproduction, and the harsh reality that free labor was now obsolete. Speaking of free labor, freedmen were now in control of their own destinies. Many African-Americans were uncertain of what their “destiny” might be, but one thing was certain: they wanted to be truly free. White Southerners refused to let blacks become equals; no set of amendments or laws were going to stop them. This white “goal” set the stage for race relations in the South for the next hundred or so years. Whites had numerous tactics to ensure that white supremacy reigned. Antagonizing at the polls, circumventing laws that protected blacks, and segregating ever aspect of life imaginable were some of the obvious strategies we see in our history textbooks. However, one tactic is often overlooked, despite its significance. The systematic sexual violence against African-American women gave insight to the mentality and hypocrisy of white supremacy, transcending slavery, the Reconstruction, and the Civil Rights movement. Not only did the constant raping of black women by white men transcend centuries, it evolved in meaning. During slavery, black women suffered in silence as their master’s abused them. The Reconstruction marked the beginning in which freedwomen were speaking out, captivating the nation’s interest. The Civil Rights era used the unfortunate tarnishing of black womanhood as a political and social tool to highlight the injustices against an entire race. Two articles in Women, Families and Communities dwell on the “overlooked” white supremacy tactic that chained African-Americans for centuries. In addition, the articles acknowledge that African-American women did play a role in the freedom struggle.
Hannah Rosen’s article sheds light on the sexual violence against freedwomen in the context of the Reconstruction. The article centers on the1866 Memphis Riot. The riot began in May began as a confrontation between African-American Union soldiers and Memphis’ city’s white police force. Three days of unrest left several dead, wounded and homeless. From the riots, five freedwomen claimed to be victims of white rape. Virtually unheard of at the time, the women had the chance to testify before a congressional committee. It also brought national attention to the atrocities going on in the South (Rosen 10-11). Expanding on Rosen’s article, Danielle L. McGuire explores the significance of sexual violence against African-American women during the Civil Rights movement. One particular rape case out of Tallahassee, Florida in 1959 brought the nation to their knees. Betty Jean Owens, a college student at Florida A&M University was raped seven times by four white young men collectively the night of a formal dance. The trial was a first in that the men were found guilty of the rape of an African-American woman. The Owens’ case, along with many other controversial ones at that time, helped repress the notion of white supremacy and advance the goals of Civil Rights activist nationwide.
The articles may have focused on two time periods with almost a century between them,but one theme is clear. Sexual violence against African-American women has always beensynonymous with white supremacy. During slavery, slave owners had their way with their“property”. Yes, masters, overseers, and drivers found sexual and sadistic pleasure in exploitingblack women. However, according to McGuire, “[s]lave owners’ access to black women’s bodies strengthened their political, social, and economic power, partly because colonial laws made the offspring of slave women the property of their masters” (195). The thought of future cotton-picker could justify the violation of someone’s wife or mother. The emancipation of slave under Abraham Lincoln, theoretically freed the slaves. White felt threatened by the thought of freedmen roaming as equals. They felt that white supremacy had to be reestablished and maintained, making rape necessary. The same mentality carried well into
n
During the 19th and 20th centuries, the United States experienced a surge in rapes of white women, both in its first and second largest cities. In 1752, there were 33,067 per capita rapes. In 1911, there were 8,742 rapes in the United States. According to a National Survey of Sexual Assault in the United States. by Mark M. Anderson
The number of rapes increases with the number of dollars made. Some rapes become the norm.
,Most rapes are not in violation on an illegal basis, and are considered to be justified. The actual number of rapes increased in the United States from 6,950 in 1916 in 1913 to 6,967 in 1934, as recorded by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Since 1934, and the early 1990s, the number of rapes has risen from 4,061 (1936) to 15,711 in the 1940s. The reported value of rapes for any economic time period, when the United States was only 4% white, was
18,250 US dollars.
. During the 1940’s, the number of rapes declined from 2,944 in 1916 to 1,852 in 1933, then increased to
4,500 US dollars
. In 1939-1939, the number of rapes declined steadily, from 9,100 in 1929 to 18,000 in 1946. The number of rapes declined from 1,068 in 1939 to 7,500 in 1945. The numbers among blacks increased by nearly two-thirds, from 2,340 to 3,200 by the 1940s, then went down 3-4-X to zero in 1947. According to the United Nations, there were 1,079,928 rapes in 1939, followed by 2,800 in 1940. The number of rapes rose from 1,867 in 1916 to 8,400 in 1939 and from 7,500 in 1940 to 9,100 in 1948. The number of rapes was increased fourfold from 1929 to 1943, the next two decades as reported by the U.N. Crime Victimization Survey.A large percentage of the increase in the number of rape is in the United States, but does not necessarily translate into the number of rapes among those without children.Violence against women varies widely across several socioeconomic and political systems in the United States, and not necessarily among children. Although there is no clear trend, reports of an even greater increase in violence among children from the 1970s to 2008 seem to indicate the increase. The increasing amount of rape in our United States has been attributed to increased child alcohol abuse, inadequate prenatal education (PEP), and a wide variety of nonmedical diagnoses and conditions affecting the development
n
During the 19th and 20th centuries, the United States experienced a surge in rapes of white women, both in its first and second largest cities. In 1752, there were 33,067 per capita rapes. In 1911, there were 8,742 rapes in the United States. According to a National Survey of Sexual Assault in the United States. by Mark M. Anderson
The number of rapes increases with the number of dollars made. Some rapes become the norm.
,Most rapes are not in violation on an illegal basis, and are considered to be justified. The actual number of rapes increased in the United States from 6,950 in 1916 in 1913 to 6,967 in 1934, as recorded by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Since 1934, and the early 1990s, the number of rapes has risen from 4,061 (1936) to 15,711 in the 1940s. The reported value of rapes for any economic time period, when the United States was only 4% white, was
18,250 US dollars.
. During the 1940’s, the number of rapes declined from 2,944 in 1916 to 1,852 in 1933, then increased to
4,500 US dollars
. In 1939-1939, the number of rapes declined steadily, from 9,100 in 1929 to 18,000 in 1946. The number of rapes declined from 1,068 in 1939 to 7,500 in 1945. The numbers among blacks increased by nearly two-thirds, from 2,340 to 3,200 by the 1940s, then went down 3-4-X to zero in 1947. According to the United Nations, there were 1,079,928 rapes in 1939, followed by 2,800 in 1940. The number of rapes rose from 1,867 in 1916 to 8,400 in 1939 and from 7,500 in 1940 to 9,100 in 1948. The number of rapes was increased fourfold from 1929 to 1943, the next two decades as reported by the U.N. Crime Victimization Survey.A large percentage of the increase in the number of rape is in the United States, but does not necessarily translate into the number of rapes among those without children.Violence against women varies widely across several socioeconomic and political systems in the United States, and not necessarily among children. Although there is no clear trend, reports of an even greater increase in violence among children from the 1970s to 2008 seem to indicate the increase. The increasing amount of rape in our United States has been attributed to increased child alcohol abuse, inadequate prenatal education (PEP), and a wide variety of nonmedical diagnoses and conditions affecting the development