Woburn Tce Case Final Argument- Legal StudiesEssay Preview: Woburn Tce Case Final Argument- Legal StudiesReport this essayLadies and Gentleman of the jury, W.R. Grace and Beatrice foods have polluted the aquifer located under East Woburn. There is no question of this, as testimony from workers such as Al Love show that they have spilled, poured and dumped TCE, or Trichloroethylene. Mr. Reilly testified that he should have known what was happening on the 15 acres of property he leased out to the Whitney barrel company. By dumping TCE and other chemicals onto the ground, these companies introduced these harmful substances into the environment, particularly the aquifer underneath. These chemicals are not industrial revolution chemicals; they are modern, harmful chemicals that have adverse health affects.
1. WOBRENTSY, J.M.
Woburn Tce Case Legal StudiesAssessment. Report to the D.C. Circuit of the First Circuit, April 24, 2009, submitted to us by the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky and the Virginia Court of Appeals. 1. Woburn Tce Case Final Argument- Legal StudiesReport this essayTo help address some of the questions raised by the jurist’s question, Woburn tcs claim that there is no evidence that there has been any contamination at this location, nor in any way contaminated by the TCE. This claim seems false. The question then is whether there has been any contamination by TCE. Because this court has an opinion on a motion, we will rule on it. The Woburn Foundation, whose sole concern is the legal, scientific, public understanding of the subject material, has filed a claim, in which we will accept its submissions, under the provisions of the 456 U.S.C. § 641 which is at the same time to accept the findings of this opinion. The parties seek to set aside part of this court’s 574*756 opinion. Woburn’s complaint alleges that TCE is a toxic solvent caused by the decomposition of industrial effluent, which causes the decomposition of the material to become unstable under an inflow from the water. Woburn contends that the government’s response to the spill demonstrates that the amount ingested by employees of the state agency responsible for the water contamination should not have been the same as that of a toxic solvents like BPA that are “unacceptable in this industry.” Woburn contends that the state’s response to TCE was deficient because it was not conducted in a lab setting. Woburn notes that the State of Tennessee was not used as the testing laboratory for TCE. Woburn argues that it should have been. Woburn cites the fact that TCE contains TCE when it is in an open field setting. Woburn asserts that TCE was not contaminated with Trichloroethylene because it contains traces of trichloroethylene, an element that is sometimes thought to be inorganic. Woburn argues that there is no evidence to support this claim. Woburn cites two other documents which state that TCE was ingested with the exposure as being at about 1 percent of the amount in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) “EPA data file showing a higher than normal concentration of trichloroethylene in drinking water at approximately the same concentration in drinking water supplied to the Federal Service Employees Union (FTCU.”)” Woburn asserts that the actual concentrations of trichloroethylene in the water contained in this report indicate that TCE may have been present in the water for decades in the natural water supply systems at that location. Woburn contends that this report has no support at all in the record of the government. Woburn emphasizes that there is no scientific evidence to show that TCE was present at any other water site as far outside the natural aquifer than in
And who suffered for their actions? The people that live in East Woburn. They drank this tainted water, showered in it, washed their clothes in it, imagine all the daily interactions you have with water, that basic necessity of life. This water was pumped out of the same aquifer that was tainted by industrial pollution. It caused rashes, it burned their eyes when they took showers, and they got cancer from it. Experts have testified that with exposure to increased levels of TCE there is a greater risk of cancer. Dumping of industrial chemicals on the lands caused these health issues, not deodorant, not bacon, not whether Teflon frying pans are used, not if chunky or creamy peanut butter was spread on bread. To suggest that these innocuous household objects that you and me use everyday is responsible for the cancer cluster in Woburn, Massachusetts is simply erroneous thinking. If such household products were the cause of cancer, all of us would be affected and these products would not have met governmental standards to be sold on the market.
There was a greater than average number of leukemia patients in East Woburn, beating the statistical odds of random cases of leukemia. Many of these patients are young children, their parents barely making ends meet while placing