Essay About Wronged Party And Unjust Acts

The Republic Of Plato
Essay Preview: The Republic Of Plato
Report this essay
After reading Book II in “The Republic of Plato” I have many questions. I understand what it is that Glaucon and his brother are trying to say. Justice is a concept of a group of people that is created by fear of injustice. Its a necessary evil in their opinion. You do not commit unjust acts towards others so that others will not commit them towards you. Its like an early version of the golden rule. I dont however understand his definition of a just or unjust man. In Glaucons story about the ring that makes you invisible he is trying to show that even a just man will act unjustly if given the chance to do so with impunity. By committing unjust acts he shows himself to be unjust. I dont really agree with Glaucon, justice is something inherent to the person, a sense of right and wrong. The foundation is morals and the result is justice. Law is what is created when you fear unjust acts. Law is created so people dont unjustly towards each other. Justice is something that is only known by the person who unjustly acted upon. Only the wronged party can decide what will make them feel justice. I would not commit murder whether I could get away with it or not. It is wrong to take another life in malice therefore I would not do it, even with a ring of invisibility.