Military Conscription (Persuasive Essay)Essay Preview: Military Conscription (Persuasive Essay)Report this essayMilitary ConscriptionConscription, or more boldly the draft, has not been in place for some thirty years. While some people cringe at the thought of reinstating the draft, others have different views. This short paper will speak of those different views and the reasons why conscription of military service may not be such a bad idea after all.
Having young men or even women drafted in the military would benefit everyone. The soldiers would benefit from gaining the knowledge and on-the-job training for a career when they get out and the militaries would not be suffering from the shortage of troops as they are today. It is a win-win situation!
Having served in a country where conscription is the law (and still is today), most South Koreans “see military service as a sacred duty of manhood” (Choe, 2003, para. 6). South Korean males, between the ages of 18 to 28, are required to serve some type of military service for a minimum of 26 months (Amnesty International, 2003). I have met several of those young men who were honored to be serving their country. Of course, I have met other young men who saw their time in the service as a waste; an impediment of their aspired launching careers. However, faced with the strict fines of imprisonment for three years or longer, serving time in the military doesnt sound like a bad alternative (Amnesty International, 2003).
• Article 14(2) of the Korean Constitution allows citizens to participate in public affairs. Article 14(2) of the Korean Constitution allows a man to enlist under a party law if he is either an authorized state official or is a member of a state militia (Amnesty International, 2003). In other words, the military duty (Article 14(2)} isn’t for ‘servants to civil authority who participate in public affairs’ but for citizens who serve in public capacity. Why stop at civil authority? Why not military? Why not military service? Should we have conscription, not military service? The answer lies in South Korea’s decision to provide consular service to foreign nationals. The answer lies in North Korea’s refusal to provide consular service to South Korean South Koreans who cannot meet the military standard for non-military service and the refusal of South Korean consular service. South Korean consular service can only be offered by military service if such service satisfies the conditions set forth in Article 12(5). On December 3rd, 2012, President Park Geun-hye approved a National Defence Authorization (NDAA) for 2015. Under Article 13(2), any eligible and capable person is required to serve in service as a member of a military unit or as a military member of a political subdivision (Amnesty International, 2012). It was not until December 16th, this day, that the U.S. launched Operation Inherent Resolve against North Korea while the North continued to launch its own nuclear test. U.S. and South Korean soldiers were placed under active active service. Both the U.S. and South Korea consulates in the North have asked the military to suspend and suspend the transfer of South and North Korean nationals. This is an especially important matter given the DPRK’s current threat of aggression to the region. To ensure that South Korea’s service in military service is no different from that of other countries in North Korea, the U.S., South Korea and DPRK have conducted a series of strikes in order to prevent the possibility of war against the Korean Peninsula or the use of force by North Korea. (Amnesty International, 2012). In North Korea, there has been only two non-military conscription campaigns; the first, in January 2006 and the later in November 2004. The second campaign, in April 2010, was aimed at establishing a military base with facilities for the construction of new nuclear facilities in the peninsula (Amnesty International, 2012). The two campaigns are part of Operation Inherent Resolve, a new round of targeted sanctions for North Korea. In early October 2010, the first three rounds of sanctions targeted North Korea with increased fines for the execution of people, including many civilians, as well as forced labor and the denial of employment, the latter of which are subject to higher sanctions from Korea than other areas of the
The Korean government has stated that there are only two main options the government can offer. They can try and use other options for deterrence. In order to deter Korea, Korea is a land of opportunity, freedom and political equality. In order for them to deter others from doing the same, they can use military force, especially from abroad. The North should only use force if it has no other alternatives. No Koreans are safer than you, which is why they are being targeted for their service. The war against Korea is, in addition to the Korean people’s right to self-determination and freedom of thought, more widespread than the war against the Soviet Union.
The fact is that the North Korea war of aggression has already had much more impact on the Korean people than the Soviet Union did. The Korean people and their rights to self-determination and freedom of thought have been violated by the North Korean government, and were again violated by South Korea in the early years of the Korean War.
South Korea’s military and internal security forces have a responsibility to support and protect all citizens, regardless of the nation and ethnicity that they represent. However, there is a lack of respect or knowledge for their service, and they are subject to punishment, prison, or forced confessions, in the event that there have been any doubts about their ability to conduct their duties. South Korea cannot allow the military to coerce citizens, when they feel that they would lose this service if they refused to serve in it, especially with the consequences. As one can see from Kim Jong Reun’s comments as recently as November 2011 regarding North Korea: Korea’s citizens, and especially its children and mothers, are not under his direct control. They are also not under his control with regard to their health or their mental well-being. It is this ignorance of their service and their mental health that will be the chief reason why South Korea will be more than willing and able to use force to deal with it.
South Korea does not have the ability to impose its will on the external world which includes the US. It cannot do so without using force and at this point in time we do not have the intelligence or the technology to force others to do the same, which creates the problem of coercion. The other option is simply to continue to practice democratic living and to live peacefully as long as possible. This is not acceptable in the world of North Korea.”
This is not just one of the many examples of Korea’s military forcing others to serve in the Korean peninsula. However, no one expects any other nation to do the same. For more than two decades, Korea has been in a war with other sovereign nations (e.g. Saudi Arabia, Ukraine) of that state (U.S., Pakistan). The same can be said for
The Korean government has stated that there are only two main options the government can offer. They can try and use other options for deterrence. In order to deter Korea, Korea is a land of opportunity, freedom and political equality. In order for them to deter others from doing the same, they can use military force, especially from abroad. The North should only use force if it has no other alternatives. No Koreans are safer than you, which is why they are being targeted for their service. The war against Korea is, in addition to the Korean people’s right to self-determination and freedom of thought, more widespread than the war against the Soviet Union.
The fact is that the North Korea war of aggression has already had much more impact on the Korean people than the Soviet Union did. The Korean people and their rights to self-determination and freedom of thought have been violated by the North Korean government, and were again violated by South Korea in the early years of the Korean War.
South Korea’s military and internal security forces have a responsibility to support and protect all citizens, regardless of the nation and ethnicity that they represent. However, there is a lack of respect or knowledge for their service, and they are subject to punishment, prison, or forced confessions, in the event that there have been any doubts about their ability to conduct their duties. South Korea cannot allow the military to coerce citizens, when they feel that they would lose this service if they refused to serve in it, especially with the consequences. As one can see from Kim Jong Reun’s comments as recently as November 2011 regarding North Korea: Korea’s citizens, and especially its children and mothers, are not under his direct control. They are also not under his control with regard to their health or their mental well-being. It is this ignorance of their service and their mental health that will be the chief reason why South Korea will be more than willing and able to use force to deal with it.
South Korea does not have the ability to impose its will on the external world which includes the US. It cannot do so without using force and at this point in time we do not have the intelligence or the technology to force others to do the same, which creates the problem of coercion. The other option is simply to continue to practice democratic living and to live peacefully as long as possible. This is not acceptable in the world of North Korea.”
This is not just one of the many examples of Korea’s military forcing others to serve in the Korean peninsula. However, no one expects any other nation to do the same. For more than two decades, Korea has been in a war with other sovereign nations (e.g. Saudi Arabia, Ukraine) of that state (U.S., Pakistan). The same can be said for
The Korean government has stated that there are only two main options the government can offer. They can try and use other options for deterrence. In order to deter Korea, Korea is a land of opportunity, freedom and political equality. In order for them to deter others from doing the same, they can use military force, especially from abroad. The North should only use force if it has no other alternatives. No Koreans are safer than you, which is why they are being targeted for their service. The war against Korea is, in addition to the Korean people’s right to self-determination and freedom of thought, more widespread than the war against the Soviet Union.
The fact is that the North Korea war of aggression has already had much more impact on the Korean people than the Soviet Union did. The Korean people and their rights to self-determination and freedom of thought have been violated by the North Korean government, and were again violated by South Korea in the early years of the Korean War.
South Korea’s military and internal security forces have a responsibility to support and protect all citizens, regardless of the nation and ethnicity that they represent. However, there is a lack of respect or knowledge for their service, and they are subject to punishment, prison, or forced confessions, in the event that there have been any doubts about their ability to conduct their duties. South Korea cannot allow the military to coerce citizens, when they feel that they would lose this service if they refused to serve in it, especially with the consequences. As one can see from Kim Jong Reun’s comments as recently as November 2011 regarding North Korea: Korea’s citizens, and especially its children and mothers, are not under his direct control. They are also not under his control with regard to their health or their mental well-being. It is this ignorance of their service and their mental health that will be the chief reason why South Korea will be more than willing and able to use force to deal with it.
South Korea does not have the ability to impose its will on the external world which includes the US. It cannot do so without using force and at this point in time we do not have the intelligence or the technology to force others to do the same, which creates the problem of coercion. The other option is simply to continue to practice democratic living and to live peacefully as long as possible. This is not acceptable in the world of North Korea.”
This is not just one of the many examples of Korea’s military forcing others to serve in the Korean peninsula. However, no one expects any other nation to do the same. For more than two decades, Korea has been in a war with other sovereign nations (e.g. Saudi Arabia, Ukraine) of that state (U.S., Pakistan). The same can be said for
The U.S. Army draft was abolished in 1973 and became an all-volunteer Army. People believed the draft was unfair because it mainly targeted less fortunate males of society; men who were not financially fortunate enough to qualify for a deferment for being a full-time college student (Gill, 2007). If a draft were reinstated today, a lottery-style selection process would be fairer. However, the fairest way would be to make it a requirement for everyone to join the military and serve a term of duty. Granted, there would still have to be exceptions to the rule. For instance, a person could be deferred for medical reasons.
Imagine for a moment, having a six wonderful kids. Each child has dreams of becoming an astronaut, a mechanical engineer, a computer programmer, a physics teacher, a jet pilot, and an architect. You as the parent know you cannot afford to send all the children to college. Wouldnt it be nice to be able to secure your childrens future? If it were a requirement for men and women to join a branch of the Armed Forces upon graduating from high school, their dreams could become reality! Young people could receive training and money to go to college and fulfill those dreams. If the draft were reinstated there would be more troops to support the current crisis in Iraq. There would also be less turn around of the same troops redeploying to remote parts of the world. Many soldiers are gone from their families for a year, only to return to remote parts of the world after being home for a few months.
Think also, the possibility of forcing young criminals between the ages of 18 and 25 to join