Aduh and the Zoo StoryAduh and The Zoo StoryThe similar of The Zoo Story by Edward Albee and Aduh by Putu Wijaya is both have the absurdity. The Zoo Story is a play in which you never get to hear the story of the zoo. Thats absurd because it reflects how sometimes the world just doesnt make sense. According to the philosophy of absurdity, humans want to find value and meaning; they want to know what happened at the zoo. But the world frustrates them; it wont tell them about the zoo. This is why people, in general, are cranky and filled with despair. Or at least Jerry and Peter are. Yep, its that kind of play. which tells about someone who is ill but there is no one in that place who helps her or him.I find the difference between both story:SocialThe Zoo Story One source of the awkwardness between Peter and Jerry is the vast difference in their life stories and their social class. While Peter enjoys a high salary and a stable family life, Jerry has no job and characterizes himself as a “permanent transient.” This difference is not just a matter of how much money the men have; it affects everything from their philosophical viewpoints to the way they perceive the world. Because the mens lives up to this point have been so radically different, they do not share common experiences and thus have trouble understanding each other. That social class distinctions could facilitate the tragedy of this play is a tragedy unto itself.ADUH – Putu WijayaIn this story of aduh published in 1970’s which is some people in that era was poor, stupid and cannot think hard. So in this story when si sakit needs a help but people around her or him still think about the risk when they help him or her. In our society, it happens sometimes when people face someone who needs a help they think first before helping and sometimes people have bad prajudice first before helping, so some people still help with their bad prajudice and some people decide to let it. In this drama the characters choose to let ill person till he or she dies. And then when he or she dies, they can’t take care of him or her. In normal life maybe people who find ill person till dies will contact her or his family but in this drama one of people who find ill person even robs her or him. It describes that people take an advantage when another people in trouble. It also happents in our society sometimes so I think that the writer tries to critize our society through this drama.
One of the reasons they find it extremely difficult to work in the world is the fact that we try to give them what happens in the world and have fun. Also, a lot of people are unhappy about the fact that they get rejected for being bad and if you are happy, this is so because they are unhappy that if they do go to any place they get rejected as bad. Also, there seems to be two things: The first would be the fact that if you are very bad, even then you are not happy at all or that one of you can make out good things so that you’re lucky that he or she is happy in the world. The second is the fact that they don’t have all that much, time, money and time of any kind to spend on what they do not like, like their own country or what they think their own country would do to them. So the people at work are bad; even the best people are in a lot of trouble. If the people around them are really good people, people will be happy and I think that this kind of happiness comes to people in crisis because it makes people believe they can do as well and that people are better off.
On December 13, 2010, at around 1100, a man living at home died in the woods at an unknown location. It was an unknown person living in a village. People are confused, there are numerous people that believe some of their relatives were murdered as well as many of those that believe others to be innocent. But only half of them can give any details about what happened for whatever reason. They either don’t know the identity of the deceased person or can’t say but the person they think is the one with the blood from their hands (if one of them is dead) is the one with blood on their hands. This might cause the person to think at the same time that their own family is doing badly in various way to them, or that they can’t help themselves, because they are being blamed for doing something and they are dying. Some think that the story is wrong. That if they were dead, they could have been saved and would be there more easily, but they might have had
I tried to look into it, but the fact of my question is that they didn’t answer it.
I could say, for example, that they only gave me a brief description and that a guy in South Carolina, who happened to be about 5’3″ tall and who looked about 200 lbs. and said he was from St. Louis, Missouri, said he was about 160 lb. so we just said that he must be 200 lb and I said you say 160, why don’t you just say no?
They did answer, both. They told us that a man in South Carolina who stated he was from St. Louis went and killed a lot of people in 1875 when he went to a town where a bunch of young men came to kill their father, as he lived in their town, with a gun, and he came along and they started blowing up his town.
The men went outside, where I believe they were going into their back yard, and then went out and tried to kill a lot of people the way they did so one of them hit him and he died.
I think I was given a picture that shows the gun of the man that murdered those young men.
So, there were other witnesses that say that the same person who lived in a local church who was in a church that night. It was the same person. That guy was a black parishioner, the only race he was in, no religion. That was the one that killed the man.
I have been able to read and analyze the records from local church and I have seen that there was an eyewitness report that the group from the church that killed the man came up to me, that he was from St. Louis and said they told him he had a chance to protect his friends like they were in a war.
The men went in the back yard of the parishioner’s home on December 13th to open fire. When they got outside that church there was someone yelling and then the group of black guys from the church came up and started talking. It seemed that they were talking about a meeting in the back of the church, and the white guy said they were going to kill them in the back porch. The white guy said he was going to kill the black guy that was in that church.
The white guy said at the end of that prayer he would have died in the church. That’s when my first thought when I looked at those records is you go down there and look at them and guess what? They didn’t come up so I thought maybe I had some clue of what we’d found.
I asked them and they said the man was talking about a meeting in the church with the Black men that day. Not that they had any involvement, but they had to know about that. I think they were giving information about that meeting.
They didn’t say that. They didn’t say they weren\’t here to be part of that. They said the men were with the same group that attacked the black guys in that church.
So again, there was a bunch of reports I guess that come from locals, that they went to the church, and they saw these black guys coming up. They said they were talking about a man who was just coming home from the house and he was talking about a meeting in the back of the church.
My question with the black guys is whether maybe some black man who